[comp.windows.ms.programmer] GeoWorks Ensemble: any comments?

tony@cs.tamu.edu (Tony Encarnacion) (03/06/91)

Has anybody used GeoWorks Ensemble, another window manager for PCs?  
How does it compare to Windows 3.0?

From the GeoWorks brochure, they claim that it can run on just 512K
on an XT and has Motif-compliant interface.  It comes with a text
processor, a drawing program, etc. but I did not see mention of 
program development.

pburke@vms.macc.wisc.edu (Peter Burke, MIC, 263-7744) (03/10/91)

In article <13085@helios.TAMU.EDU>, tony@cs.tamu.edu (Tony Encarnacion) writes...

>Has anybody used GeoWorks Ensemble, another window manager for PCs?  
>How does it compare to Windows 3.0?
> 
>From the GeoWorks brochure, they claim that it can run on just 512K
>on an XT and has Motif-compliant interface.  It comes with a text
>processor, a drawing program, etc. but I did not see mention of 
>program development.

I had a chance to play with Geos on a 286 machine for several hours. I 
was impressed at the speed of the thing, but I really missed some 
standard features such as a spell check for the Word Processor. 
The screen and printer fonts are breathtaking (I printed a 400 point 
letter on a Panasonic 9-pin: came out without any jaggies, yet took 
about 5 minutes to print. The menus can be taken off the menu bar and 
placed anywhere on the screen, reminding me of the NEXT environment, 
yet the screen resolution is limited to VGA, not leaving enough space to 
work in anyway. In the filemanager files appear as icons just like on a 
MAC, and one can select by dragging over groups. It even has a garbage 
can in the corner (how did they avoid a lawsuit?).
About program development: I heard the entire environment and the 
applications have been written in assembler! No wonder there is not much 
happening in terms of Geos add-ons. 
The look of the package is a little playful (just about everything is 
done in 3-D style, with lots of color and wallpaper.), but since it is 
mainly designed for a low-end (home?) market, this design is probably 
appropriate.
The best feature overall is the font support on screen and low-end 
printers. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PBURKE@VMS.MACC.WISC.EDU                                      (608) 263-7744
MICRO INFORMATION CENTER
1210 W. DAYTON ST.      MADISON, WI 53706        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------