[sci.engr] Real time data acquisisition and X.25

shuford@cs.utk.edu (Richard Shuford) (02/03/91)

   martinea@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Alain Martineau of Hydro Quebec,
                              Centre de Conduite du Reseau) writes:
>  ...trying to write the specifications for a new national control center.
>  ...So we try to incorporate in our specs as many standards as possible,
>  we really need an OPEN system;
>  we don't want to repeat this 70 million dollars purchase every ten years.

Historically, the ISO committees have been more concerned to create
standards with maximum generality than to design implementations
that perform at high speed or withstand real-world stresses.  Since
you seem to have significant real-time performance concerns, the
lengthy negotiation phase that most OSI protocols go through to
establish a connection are a bottleneck that could become a pain in
the neck.

If you were to use your own physical media, your choice of protocols
could reflect more closely the requirements of the problem than if you
have to use whatever is available on somebody else's network.

Therefore, instead of using X.25 links or any other shared-resource
network, have you thought about getting your transmission people to
install fiber-optic ground wire (FOGW) along your high-voltage
transmission corridors?  This puts the circuits right where you need
data, and you can install fiber-optic transmitters and receivers (and
other active hardware) of your own choosing.  The bandwidth is
typically limited by the electronics, not by the fiber, so future
upgrades in capacity would not require stringing new cables.  

Such a design would give you complete control over the physical media
for your data collection, giving a margin of confidence that you
cannot have when your time-critical data are sharing a wire with
somebody else's traffic.

Of course, if you absolutely must have constant data flowing at a
constant rate, you would be well advised to arrange for back-up
circuits, which could be dial-up links on the switched network.  Or
perhaps you have non-co-routed redundant paths in your power-
distribution network so that the FOGW links could also be routed for
failsafe operation.
-- 
....Richard S. Shuford  | These opinions here are held neither by the
....shuford@cs.utk.edu  | University of Tennessee nor by the National
....BIX: richard        | Football League.