[comp.unix.internals] NFS & security

rang@cs.wisc.edu (Anton Rang) (12/17/90)

In article <4088@osc.COM> strick@osc.com (henry strickland) writes:
>In the normal NFS setup, making myself root on a workstation does not
>give me root priveleges on the filesystem of a remote NFS server
>which I can mount the partitions of.  [ ... ]  Now if any of these
>non-root users owns (or groups has w bits on) some file in the PATH
>of root (or one of the directories or superdirectories in the PATH),
>the trojan horse can ride.

  Does Sun still install their OS distributions with directories owned
by bin?  This one bit me once, before I realized how easy it was to
spoof the YP "authentication" (netgroups stuff) which was being used
to "restrict" (ha!) people from mounting our servers....  Sigh.

	Anton
   
+---------------------------+------------------+-------------+
| Anton Rang (grad student) | rang@cs.wisc.edu | UW--Madison |
+---------------------------+------------------+-------------+

rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) (12/17/90)

In article <RANG.90Dec16131137@nexus.cs.wisc.edu> rang@cs.wisc.edu (Anton Rang) writes:
>
>  Does Sun still install their OS distributions with directories owned
>by bin?  This one bit me once, before I realized how easy it was to
>spoof the YP "authentication" (netgroups stuff) which was being used
>to "restrict" (ha!) people from mounting our servers....  Sigh.

 Not only that, but they still install their distributions with a '+' in
/etc/hosts.equiv, leaving a security hole big enough to drive a truck
through.

-- 
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
  Neil W. Rickert, Computer Science               <rickert@cs.niu.edu>
  Northern Illinois Univ.
  DeKalb, IL 60115                                   +1-815-753-6940