[comp.unix.xenix.sco] WD8013 & SCO UNIX

mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Michael Squires) (10/17/90)

I've just discovered that the WD8013 in my SCO UNIX (ODT 1.0, actually)
works well - when I don't use the graphics features of my VGA plasma
display.  Running an X display causes all non-X displays to vanish,
although the keyboard works (at least long enough to shut down the system).

It looks like the WD & the VGA board are conflicing, as SCO says they may
do in the release notes.  I've not tried changing parameters (yet); I was
using INT 2, IO 280, 16K RAM at D0000.

On the other hand, I used a WD8003EBT with an 8-bit Paradise clone under
XENIX 2.3.2 for quite a while (although never with X11).

A 3C501 works, but gives numerous errors in netstat -i and is known to have
serious problems with NFS mounts (there's a special entry in the release notes
about that, and I was warned by One Who Knows to stay away from that board in
systems intended for heavy use.

On using both a WD1007V and Adaptec controller in the same system - no
real news there, except it seems necessary to disable the Adaptec BIOS.
One respondent stated that a secondary HD controller had to have at least
one SCSI HD on it (this may be true, but SCO UNIX boots from the floopy 
with a SCSI tape at controller 0, LUN 2, and I can't imagine they'd do that
if it only worked with SCSI HD's).

Another user reports that he sold his Orchid Prodesigner VGA board after
failing to get it to operate properly with his hardware and SCO products.
-- 

Mike Squires (mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu)     812 855 3974 (w) 812 333 6564 (h)
mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu          546 N Park Ridge Rd., Bloomington, IN 47408
Under construction: mikes@sir-alan@cica.indiana.edu

mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) (10/18/90)

mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Michael Squires) writes:
> It looks like the WD & the VGA board are conflicing, as SCO says they may
> do in the release notes.  I've not tried changing parameters (yet); I was
> using INT 2, IO 280, 16K RAM at D0000.

IRQ 2 can be flakey under Unix because it's usually rerouted to IRQ 9;
under DOS, you don't see this, but under Unix, it quickly becomes
apparent...

Try switching the Ethernet card to IRQ 5, or another unused
interrupt.  (Use /etc/conf/cf.d/vectorsinuse to find out which
interrupt vectors you're using.)  That should fix it.

--
Marc Unangst               |
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us  | "Bus error: passengers dumped"
...!umich!leebai!mudos!mju | 

bxw@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au (Brad Willcott) (10/18/90)

mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Michael Squires) writes:

>I've just discovered that the WD8013 in my SCO UNIX (ODT 1.0, actually)
>works well - when I don't use the graphics features of my VGA plasma
>display.  Running an X display causes all non-X displays to vanish,
>although the keyboard works (at least long enough to shut down the system).

>It looks like the WD & the VGA board are conflicing, as SCO says they may
>do in the release notes.  I've not tried changing parameters (yet); I was
>using INT 2, IO 280, 16K RAM at D0000.

If possible, switch your VGA board to "8 bit" mode, and try using:
	INT 5, I/O 2a0 & address DC000.

>On the other hand, I used a WD8003EBT with an 8-bit Paradise clone under
>XENIX 2.3.2 for quite a while (although never with X11).

[...]

-- 
Brad Willcott,                          ACSnet:     bxw@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz
Computing Services,                     Internet:   bxw@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au
Australian Defence Force Academy,       UUCP:!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ccadfa.oz!bxw
Northcott Dr. Campbell ACT Australia 2600  +61 6 268 8584  +61 6 268 8150 (Fax)

rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) (10/19/90)

mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:

> IRQ 2 can be flakey under Unix because it's usually rerouted to IRQ 9;
> under DOS, you don't see this, but under Unix, it quickly becomes
> apparent...

No, this is just wrong.  IRQ 2 does not exist on an AT bus, period.  The
position on a PC-bus connector corresponding to IRQ 2 is the same as the
position on an AT-bus connector corresponding to IRQ 9.  Period.  If you
take a card designed for the PC, set it up to generate IRQ 2, and plug it
into an AT-bus machine, it will generate IRQ 9.  Nothing flakey about it.
This re-routing is pure hardware, and UNIX deals with it just fine.

(Isn't this in the FAQ?)
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd       Boulder, CO   (303)449-2870
   ...Never offend with style when you can offend with substance.