[comp.unix.xenix.sco] Maintenance free UUCP

dkeisen@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) (10/17/90)

We are looking for a way to implement file transfer programs to go
with the software we develop. The obvious thing to do is to set
up menu interfaces to UUCP, but we were not sure how reasonable
this is for a target market where the users are not computer people, 
not even close. 

Is UUCP reliable enough to run without an on-site administrator to monitor it?



--
Dave Eisen                      	    Home: (415) 323-9757
dkeisen@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU           Office: (415) 967-5644
1447 N. Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View, CA 94043

rpeglar@csinc.UUCP (Rob Peglar) (10/17/90)

-- 
Rob Peglar	Comtrol Corp.	2675 Patton Rd., St. Paul MN 55113
		A Control Systems Company	(800) 926-6876

...uunet!csinc!rpeglar

davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) (10/21/90)

In article <1990Oct17.071310.23746@Neon.Stanford.EDU> dkeisen@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) writes:

| Is UUCP reliable enough to run without an on-site administrator to monitor it?

  I'll take a stab at that one and say yes. However, you will have to
configure it to be run that way. That means to send mail to someone if
it finds a problem, to have shells which do cleanup (not the standard
SCO stuff, please), etc.

  I have several systems which run themselves when I'm away, and do a
good job of it.

  The real question is if any system can be operated without an
administrator, and I submit that answer is no. Someone has to read the
mail, take the dumps, etc. The person does not need to be expert, just
dedicated enough to do simple things as instructed by a mail message
"put the Monday tape in the drive before going home!"
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me