[net.ham-radio] illegal monitoring

rick@sbcs.UUCP (Rick Spanbauer) (01/06/84)

	With regard to the illegal monitoring question, the issue reduces
	to:

		1. Those who have `illegal' setups regularly quote
		   FCC regulations, i.e. as long as the signals cross
		   my property, and I do not divulge their contents,
		   I may legally view/listen to the signals.

		2. The utilities (MDS, satellite movie companies, etc)
		   quote the theft of service laws, i.e. if you are
	 	   somehow bypassing their rate structure (it really
		   does not matter how), then you are breaking the 
		   law.


	So please, lets not start a debate over who is correct; many
	inconclusive wars have already been fought over this question.
	Let the courts decide. 

						Rick Spanbauer
						SUNY/Stony Brook



	ps. I fall into category (1), and believe that if the sender
	    wants to protect the message contents, it should be 
	    encrypted in such a way that it is not cost effective for
	    me to decrypt the message.