[comp.unix.xenix.sco] xenix version differences? 2.2.3 vs 2.3.2 -- kernel size bug?

danielw@wyn386.mi.org (Daniel Wynalda) (06/13/91)

I have two Xenix machines running side by side that behave slightly 
different on certain occasions.  Here's what I've got.


80386/33  SCO Xenix 386 2.2.3

80386/25  SCO Xenix 386 2.3.3


I am being told by my accounting software vendor that I need to increase
my NFILES, NINODE, and NFLOCKS counts in my kernel to a large number
(300, 300, and 400 respectively).  I can increase SOME of these but if ALL
of them are increased it appears that I increase kernel size too much.

I realize that these settings take up part of user memory. Both machines
have 8 MB of RAM and LOTS of cards and drivers in them.

When I increase the counts, relink the kernel, and re-boot the machine,
it cycles after the 

Boot
:

prompt and never boots the kernel.  This, in the past, has been remedied
by replacing the /boot program with a new boot routine with proper
delays.  This doesn't appear to be the case.

Does anyone have a clue as to what this might be?  I notice that when I 
change these parameters on the 2.3.2 machine the kernel's total size
increases (>640K to start).  When on 2.2.3 it appears that the kernel
size remains the same.  Am I hitting a limit in this version of
Xenix or is there something that might be amuck?

			Daniel Wynalda






-- 
Daniel Wynalda       | (616) 866-1561 X22 Ham:N8KUD Net:danielw@wyn386.mi.org
Wynalda Litho Inc.   | 8221 Graphic Industrial Pk. | Rockford, MI  49341