[comp.unix.sysv386] SLIP on SCO UNIX 3.2?

ebersman@uunet.UU.NET (Paul Ebersman) (09/22/90)

Have any of the public domain SLIPs been ported successfully to SCO
UNIX 3.2?

Also, I've been poking through the SLIPs here and started wondering
if we really have all the public domain versions that are available.
-- 
                   Paul A. Ebersman @ UUNET Communications
                   uunet!ebersman or ebersman@uunet.uu.net
       The difference between theory and practice in practice is greater
           than the difference between theory and practice in theory.

davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) (09/23/90)

In article <105784@uunet.UU.NET> ebersman@uunet.UU.NET (Paul Ebersman) writes:
| 
| Have any of the public domain SLIPs been ported successfully to SCO
| UNIX 3.2?

  What problems have you had with the SCO SL/IP? Also, does anyone have
a SL/IP for MS-DOS? I had one from somewhere, but it failed with both
Sun and SCO SL/IP (which work with one another).
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me

cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) (09/23/90)

In article <1945@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
>
>  What problems have you had with the SCO SL/IP? Also, does anyone have
>a SL/IP for MS-DOS? I had one from somewhere, but it failed with both
>Sun and SCO SL/IP (which work with one another).

Sun has one that they include with PC-NFS (it even includes the source
for the unix side, although it is sun-specific)

-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170 

mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (michael squires) (09/23/90)

In article <1945@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
>
>  What problems have you had with the SCO SL/IP? Also, does anyone have
>Sun and SCO SL/IP (which work with one another).

According to a posting on the net (comp.arcives(?)) Clarkson University has
released binaries for a version of NCSA Telnet has SL/IP support.  I've
heard that KA9Q will also work but it sounds as if you may have tried it.

rhealey@digibd.com (Rob Healey) (09/27/90)

In article <105784@uunet.UU.NET> ebersman@uunet.UU.NET (Paul Ebersman) writes:
>Have any of the public domain SLIPs been ported successfully to SCO
>UNIX 3.2?
>
	Hmmm, dunno about the PD versions but right now the 386 box in my cube
	is going over a serial line to our central server via the SL/IP that
	comes with SCO's TCP/IP package for UNIX. ( The server is running the 
	Xenix SCO TCP/IP package). It all works fine and dandy. Get almost
	5k/sec xfer on large files. NOTE: I'm using a 56K serial line, one
	of the advantages of the DigiBoard line...B^).
	
	If you need to run SL/IP on SCO systems just use what came with SCO
	TCP/IP. Remember to have the ethernetted server do a proxy arp
	for it's SL/IP clients or they won't be visable on the ethernet.
	(OK, OK, so you COULD manually put an entry in everyone's route
	  table but that's a little drastic...)

		-Rob Healey

Speaking for myself, not the employer.