[net.ham-radio] scanner vs scanner & Bearcat -> Uniden

parnass@ihuxf.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) (06/20/84)

x
       At last count,  there  were  about  21  scanners	 here  (got
       another	one yesterday) of various brands, not all on at	one
       time!  I	have serviced Regency,	Bearcat,  Plectron,  Sonar,
       Radio  Shack,  Craig,  SBE,  Motorola,  and Heathkit monitor
       receivers to name a few,	and still have 2 Tennelecs  waiting
       for attention which they	will probably never get.

       Scanner features	often differ  not  only	 by  model  but	 by
       manufacturer.   For  instance,  Bearcat	programmables allow
       enable/disable of the delay function on a per-channel basis.
       Regency	only  permits the delay	to be enabled/disabled glo-
       bally, that is, for all the channels at one time.

       Both Bearcat and	Regency, as well as Radio Shack	offer  some
       good  models.   Stay away from the Bearcat 100, and scanners
       made by JIL, Fox, Tennelec, and Robyn.

       In the name of cost cutting, some  newer	 models	 have  done
       away  with the concept of a "channel bank", i.e.	the ability
       to select/deselect a group of channels at a time.  The  bank
       concept was a good one.	It may be inconvenient to operate a
       30 channel scanner  without  banks  (e.g.   Regency  MX3000,
       HX1000A)	if you operate the way many scanner hobbyists do.

       Heath's new scanner is really a Bearcat	20/20  in  semi-kit
       form,  and  should  appeal  to those who	want to	monitor	the
       commercial aircraft band.

       Bearcat was just	purchased by Uniden, maker  of	radios	and
       cordless	telephones.

       My favorites are	the Bearcat 300,  the  Regency	M400  (just
       discontinued), and the Regency K500 (predates the M400).

-- 
==========================================================================
Bob Parnass,  AT&T Bell Laboratories - ihnp4!ihuxf!parnass - (312)979-5414