james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen) (11/20/90)
1. Does AT&T SysVr3.2 have <sys/ptem.h>? 2. If not, which add-on package of AT&T SysVr3.2 adds this file? At this point, the consensus seems to be to drop <sys/sioctl.h> in all configurations and to use <sys/ptem.h> instead. It is believed that there are few systems with <sys/sioctl.h> that do not also have <sys/ptem.h>, and that ISC no longer sells this configuration. -- James R. Van Artsdalen james@bigtex.cactus.org "Live Free or Die" Dell Computer Co 9505 Arboretum Blvd Austin TX 78759 512-338-8789
dcon@cbnewsc.att.com (david.r.connet) (11/21/90)
In article <50005@bigtex.cactus.org>, james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen) writes: > 1. Does AT&T SysVr3.2 have <sys/ptem.h>? Yes. 3 machines that I'm on: iwtng iwtng 3.2.1 3 3B2 cbnewsc cbnewsc 3.2.2 3 3B2 iwwlb iwwlb 3.2 2.2 i386 > 2. If not, which add-on package of AT&T SysVr3.2 adds this file? > > At this point, the consensus seems to be to drop <sys/sioctl.h> in all > configurations and to use <sys/ptem.h> instead. It is believed that > there are few systems with <sys/sioctl.h> that do not also have > <sys/ptem.h>, and that ISC no longer sells this configuration. None of these systems have <sys/sioctl.h>. Dave Connet dcon@iwtng.att.com