[net.ham-radio] Radar Jammers BEWARE

parnass@ihuxf.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) (06/27/84)

x
       From an article in net.auto:

  > Nf-ID: #N:trsvax:55200084:000:5280

  > --->>>   Hitchhikers guide to radar	jamming	  <<<---
			  .
			  .
	    [explanation of how	Doppler	radar works]
			  .
			  .
  > How	about jamming.	OK, lets assume	that you don't care about the legality
  > and	you just want to try to	jam for	funs sake.
			  .
			  .
	 [how to construct a radar jamming transmitter]
			  .
			  .
  > Be forwarned that police are getting more adept at detecting jammers, and
  > the	penalty	is not light.  If you have a HAM ticket, you could lose	it.
  > There could	even be	criminal penalties in some states.
			  .
			  .
  > ....If you do jam........
			  .
			  .
		      [more jamming hints]
			  .
			  .


       Is  this	 "radical  chic",  or  just  poor   judgement?
       Congratulations,	you have just used the net to advocate
       the breaking of federal and international regulations:

	  + FCC	Rules &	Regulations:
	       - R&R 89.51 - Station Authorization Required.
	       - R&R 89.117 -  Acceptability  of  Transmitters
		 for Licensing

	  + Communications Act of 1934:
	       - Sec 324 - Use of Minimum Power

	  + International Telecommunications  Commission  Con-
	    vention 1947:
	       - Article 44 - Harmful Interference

	  + International Radio	 Regulations  Annexed  to  the
	    International Telecommunications Convention	1947:
	       - Article 13 -  Unnecessary  transmissions  and
		 superfluous signals
	       - Article 22 - Station license

	  + Geneva Treaty 1959:
	       - Article 1 Sec 3 - Harmful interference


       I hope you don't	hold amateur or	commercial licenses.

	...Bob
	(FCC Radiotelephone Operator's License P2-18-37775/Radar Endorsement)


-- 
==========================================================================
Bob Parnass,  AT&T Bell Laboratories - ihnp4!ihuxf!parnass - (312)979-5414 

lrd@drusd.UUCP (DuBroffLR) (06/27/84)

[Just in case...]

       "Is this 'radical chic', or just poor judgement?
       Congratulations,	you have just used the net to advocate
       the breaking of federal and international regulations:

	Bob Parnass,  AT&T Bell Laboratories
	- ihnp4!ihuxf!parnass - (312)979-5414 
	(FCC Radiotelephone Operator's License
	P2-18-37775/Radar Endorsement)"

From the quoted exerpts, it SEEMS as if Mr. Parnass and I have read the
same article, but our reactions are totally different.

I did not see any details that would enable anyone to build a RADAR
jammer if the builder did not already have the knowledge to do so;
all I saw was a general description of the principles involved.

Further, I don't agree that the original poster has "just used the net
to advocate the breaking of federal and international regulations."
I saw neither advocacy nor encouragement; indeed, I saw cautions and
warnings of the penalties for using a jammer.

Maybe we weren't reading the same article.

		L. R. DuBroff	...[ihnp4!]drusd!lrd

		FCC Ratio Telephone Operator License
		(First Class) #P1-18-52382
		Ship Radar Endorsement