[comp.unix.sysv386] Making X work on Interactive 386/ix

dipto@umbc3.UMBC.EDU (Dipto Chakravarty) (11/30/90)

What is needed to run X gracefully under Interactive? Can someone
please throw some light/wisdom on possible incompatibilities and/or
known bugs/limitations with the components I have. Please email 
your comments; I will summarize and post them later. 

On an ALR 33/486 we are running Interactive 386/ix 2.0.2, along with 
their X Windows 1.1 distribution ... and the performance sucks.

We have a Microsoft serial mouse and a high-performance Microfield
V8 graphics card on the system, ... but, the mouse drags are at a 
lag of 3-4 seconds behind!

I would like  to know what is the best known combination of components
if I were to go for a price independent choice of graphics card, 
machine etc., preferably with Interactive o.s
-- 
    dipto@umbc.bitnet -----\                     /----- uunet!ats!dipto
 dipto@umbc3.umbc.edu ------>   In-real-life:   <------ +1 301 384 1425
dipto%ats@uunet.uu.net ----/  Dipto Chakravarty  \----- CMSC, U. of MD.

src@scuzzy.in-berlin.de (Heiko Blume) (12/01/90)

dipto@umbc3.UMBC.EDU (Dipto Chakravarty) writes:
>On an ALR 33/486 we are running Interactive 386/ix 2.0.2, along with 
>their X Windows 1.1 distribution ... and the performance sucks.

>We have a Microsoft serial mouse and a high-performance Microfield
>V8 graphics card on the system, ... but, the mouse drags are at a 
>lag of 3-4 seconds behind!

there seems to be something wrong with your machine. you should
get really good performance with the microfield (regarding graphics
speed) and the 486 (regarding general performance). i think the 
problem is with the mouse, perhaps the serial port is on the 
wrong interrupt or something. You've got Real Nice Hardware,
and interactive is really able to use it!

we used a 386/25 with a microfield and a genius mouse with
very good results.

keep trying!
-- 
      Heiko Blume <-+-> src@scuzzy.in-berlin.de <-+-> (+49 30) 691 88 93
                    public source archive [HST V.42bis]:
        scuzzy Any ACU,f 38400 6919520 gin:--gin: nuucp sword: nuucp
                     uucp scuzzy!/src/README /your/home

campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) (12/03/90)

In article <4572@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> dipto@umbc3.umbc.edu (Dipto Chakravarty) writes:
-
-On an ALR 33/486 we are running Interactive 386/ix 2.0.2, along with 
-their X Windows 1.1 distribution ... and the performance sucks.
-
-We have a Microsoft serial mouse and a high-performance Microfield
-V8 graphics card on the system, ... but, the mouse drags are at a 
-lag of 3-4 seconds behind!

Something is horribly wrong with your system.  I run 386/ix 2.0.2 with
Interactive's X11 1.1 on a 20 MHz 386 and the performance is pretty good --
actually very good, except for loading big bitmaps.  At work I have a 25 MHz
386 running SCO Open Doorstop; it's quite a bit slower, but nothing like
what you've described.

I have noticed that my work system, which has a Logitech serial mouse,
exhibits very slow (although not measured in seconds!) and erratic mouse
response.  At home, I have a Logitech bus mouse, and it works MUCH more
nicely.  So I would recommend ditching the serial mouse, but I suspect
there's something much more fundamental wrong with your system.

-- 
Larry Campbell             The Boston Software Works, Inc., 120 Fulton Street
campbell@redsox.bsw.com    Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (USA)
      The U.S. Constitution may not be perfect, but it sure beats
      whatever we're using right now.

john@newave.UUCP (John A. Weeks III) (12/05/90)

In <1607@redsox.bsw.com> campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) writes:
> In <4572@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> dipto@umbc3.umbc.edu (Dipto Chakravarty) writes:
> - We have a Microsoft serial mouse and a high-performance Microfield
> - V8 graphics card on the system, ... but, the mouse drags are at a 
> - lag of 3-4 seconds behind!
>
> Something is horribly wrong with your system.

Just a whim, but check to see what interrupt you are using for the mouse.
I tried my tape drive on interrupt 2, and it did not work.  I changed it
to 9, and it works fine.  The sympthoms were similar--it sort of worked,
but real slow.  A net neighbor had a similar problem with his mouse.

-john-

-- 
===============================================================================
John A. Weeks III               (612) 942-6969               john@newave.mn.org
NeWave Communications                 ...uunet!rosevax!tcnet!wd0gol!newave!john
===============================================================================

cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) (12/05/90)

In article <1607@redsox.bsw.com> campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) writes:
>I have noticed that my work system, which has a Logitech serial mouse,
>exhibits very slow (although not measured in seconds!) and erratic mouse
>response.  At home, I have a Logitech bus mouse, and it works MUCH more
>nicely.  So I would recommend ditching the serial mouse, but I suspect
>there's something much more fundamental wrong with your system.

This isn't the case with any of the Logitech serial devices we have here.  They
all work like a charm and the response is great.  (we use both serial mice and
serial trackballs).

If you are having problems with a mouse, it isn't the class of mouse itself (in
other words, your mouse may be screwed up, but replacing it with another one
from the same manufacturer should fix the problem).

-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170 

heimir@rhi.hi.is (Heimir Thor Sverrisson) (12/07/90)

In <1990Dec05.122421.24560@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:

>In article <1607@redsox.bsw.com> campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) writes:
>>I have noticed that my work system, which has a Logitech serial mouse,
>>exhibits very slow (although not measured in seconds!) and erratic mouse
>>response.  At home, I have a Logitech bus mouse, and it works MUCH more
>>nicely.  So I would recommend ditching the serial mouse, but I suspect
>>there's something much more fundamental wrong with your system.
I've got a serial Logitech-mouse here, and had some trouble with it,
especially when starting the server (it would fail every other time) until
I changed the configuration from LOGI-S to MSC-S and since then it's been
working just fine.  I think I saw this fix in the Release notes somewhere.

Heimir Thor Sverrisson (TF3ANT)		heimir@hafro.is