ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu (Geraldo Veiga) (01/17/91)
In article <1991Jan17.001941.564@portia.Stanford.EDU> fangchin@portia.Stanford.EDU (Chin Fang) writes: >Recently there is one program written for SCO Xenix/Unix 386 called ecu >Yes, it is not written for ISC/ESIX/UHC/Microport..., but with these >vendors all claiming Xenix compatibility, potential porting effort should >be either nill or bearable. The lastest patches for ECU make some attempt to support ISC 2.2. It didn't work for me. Still there are differences in header files, and some constants not defined anywhere in ISC's includes. Admittedly, I only made a half-hearted effort in making it work, so it might be fixable without much effort. After my failed porting attempt, I could execute "ecu" but it core dump whenever I tried anything involving serial ports. As for Xenix compatability of 3.2, do they mean source code compatible with SCO? Certainly not in the case of ecu.