smitty@essnj1.ESSNJAY.COM (Hibbard T. Smith JR) (03/26/91)
Interactive unix 2.2 and COMPAQ DOS 3.3 can't seem to agree about a DOS partition. When I try and mount the DOS partition on this 110 MB disk (it's a 32MB partition), a df or dfspace only seems to know about 4 MB of space. The partition had to be created with the DOS fdisk. When it was created with the ISC fdisk, DOS wouldn't recognize it. Is this another of those strange media descriptor problems? I don't know enough about COMPAQ to know if they're non-standard or not. This COMPAQ is a DESKPRO 386, which is really a 386SX system. I've had good luck with ISC and other DOS partitions on other hardware, but, this is my first trial on a COMPAQ I'd sure appreciate any help anyone could offer. Thanks in advance. -- Smitty ------------------------------------------- Hibbard T. Smith JR smitty@essnj1.ESSNJAY.COM ESSNJAY Systems Inc. uunet!hsi!essnj1!smitty
rsj@wa4mei.UUCP (Randy Jarrett) (04/01/91)
In <809@essnj1.ESSNJAY.COM> smitty@essnj1.ESSNJAY.COM (Hibbard T. Smith JR) writes: >Interactive unix 2.2 and COMPAQ DOS 3.3 can't seem to agree about a DOS >partition. When I try and mount the DOS partition on this 110 MB disk >(it's a 32MB partition), a df or dfspace only seems to know about 4 MB of >space. >The partition had to be created with the DOS fdisk. When it was created >with the ISC fdisk, DOS wouldn't recognize it. Is this another of those >strange media descriptor problems? I don't know enough about COMPAQ to >know if they're non-standard or not. This COMPAQ is a DESKPRO 386, which >is really a 386SX system. >I've had good luck with ISC and other DOS partitions on other hardware, but, >this is my first trial on a COMPAQ >I'd sure appreciate any help anyone could offer. >Thanks in advance. >-- > Smitty >------------------------------------------- >Hibbard T. Smith JR smitty@essnj1.ESSNJAY.COM >ESSNJAY Systems Inc. uunet!hsi!essnj1!smitty I think that you will find that the problem lies in the mods that Compaq has made to the dos that they distribute. Their Dos 3.3 isn't. They have modified the fat to allow the use of a larger partition. This causes the same problems that ISC, vpix, and others have with Dos 4.xx. I think that if you don't need larger than 32MB partitions and from your message you don't than you should get ahold of a copy of MS (not PC)-DOS 3.3 and I think that your problems will go away. -- Randy Jarrett WA4MEI UUCP ...!{emory,gatech}!wa4mei!rsj | MAIL: P.O. Box 941217 PHONE +1 404 822 4073 | Atlanta, GA 30341-0217