[comp.unix.msdos] Coherent Unix

akcs.moodyblu@vpnet.chi.il.us (Matt Weisberg) (12/25/90)

Hello! 
I am looking for some information on Coherent UNIX.  I currently run an MS-
DOS based board in the Detroit Area (Milliways 1-313-553-9274  Fidonet:
120/16) but after using UNIX at school, I am have developed an interest in
it. Looking for an inexpensive way to get it on my PC, I came accross
Coherent Unix.  I have an 80386 with 672MB of hard drive space. Can anyone
tell me if this is a good buy? $99.95 seems quite unbelievable. I am also
considering running a UNIX board, so I would be looking for UNIX BBS
software as well.  Any help anyone could provide would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks!
 
 
                     Matt Weisberg

Internet: moodyblu@buhub.bradley.edu
Fidonet: Matt Weisberg at 1:120/16
or whatever my address is as listed with this message (I am new on this
system and do not know my address here)

paul@actrix.gen.nz (Paul Gillingwater) (12/27/90)

In article <2776c302-23comp.unix.msdos@vpnet.chi.il.us> akcs.moodyblu@vpnet.chi.il.us (Matt Weisberg) writes:
> I am looking for some information on Coherent UNIX.  ...

I bought Coherent for US$99.  Not a bad buy, all things considered.

> I have an 80386 with 672MB of hard drive space. 

This is where I hit a problem.  Coherent won't run with a SCSI disk
controller in the current release (3.0), and I found problems when
trying to install on my DOS system.  Coherent can use one of the 4
entries from a standard DOS partition table, but consistently
core-dumped when I tried to /etc/mkfs larger than 100 Mb.  By
reducing this to 60 Mb, it was able to create a usable file system,
but still has problems with fsck.  So it's still pretty flakey in
some areas.

> tell me if this is a good buy? $99.95 seems quite unbelievable. I am also

For the price, you get quite a nice UNIX-like feel, with a non-ANSI
C compiler and Micro-emacs-like editor.  Source code is provided for
lots of stuff (including the editor).  I like Coherent because it is
a great way for people to learn about UNIX -- it's multi-user,
although I haven't tried to break its memory management yet!  It
runs on both 286 and 386 systems.  It feels a bit clunky, but also
is very lean -- fast and compact.  The latter can be a problem if
you are porting bloated software (like rn).

> considering running a UNIX board, so I would be looking for UNIX BBS

I am planning to port Sandy's XBBS to Coherent -- this would make a
nice combination.  Anyone else interested in this?

-- 
Paul Gillingwater, paul@actrix.gen.nz

krawchuk@cpsc.UCalgary.ca (Bj Krawchuk) (12/28/90)

Matt Weisberg writes:
>   I am looking for some information on Coherent UNIX...

Check out the (not particularly glowing) review of Coherent 
in Nov 90 Byte Magazine (Unix /bin column i think).

--
	Bj

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Krawchuk 		Knowledge Sciences Laboratory 
krawchuk@cpsc.ucalgary.ca	University of Calgary
				2500 University Drive NW 
				Calgary, AB, Canada  T2N 1N4 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is only one difference between a madman and me. I am not mad.  -- Dali
------------------------------------------------------------------------------