[net.ham-radio] more dope on Goldwater's interference bill

rjr@mgweed.UUCP (Bob Roehrig) (10/09/84)

senator barry goldwater,  k7uga,  introduced  legislation  into
congress  on  september  11,  1984, that will make it a federal
offense  to  willfully  and  malciously  interfere  with  radio
communicaions.  the  bill  prohibits  jamming by any person and
authorizes the fcc  to  prevent  continued  interference  while
proceeding  against  the  perprerator.  senate  bill  2975 also
clarifies and reaffirms existing law.

goldwater, in addressing the senate, said "recently the federal
communications  commission  has noted a significant increase in
the  number  of  complaints  concerning  willful  or  malicious
interference  to  radio  signals. i have personally listened to
some of this malicious interference. just  one  individual  can
prevent  effective communications by many other persons wishing
to use a channel.

"there is only a limited amount of radio spectrum available, so
we  must  ensure  it  is  wisely  used  in the public interest.
unfortunately this errant behavior is  increasingly  preventing
such  use  in  a  number of different services." goldwater said
such  objectional  interference  is  created  by  intentionally
transmitting  on  a  channel  already  in  use or by "whistles,
tapes,  records  or  other   types   of   obnoxious   noises...
transmitted  for the sole purpose of interrupting or preventing
other uses of the frequency."

while noting that this type of interference is prevalent on the
amateur,  citizens,  and marine band, goldwater said that it is
also creeping into the private land  mobile,  public  safety...
(and even the) government communications networks such as those
of the faa and department of defense.

"the   increase   in   willful   interference   to   authorized
communications  simply  must  be stopped in order to ensure the
reliability of the authorized public interest and  safety  uses
of the radio spectrum."

"the purposes of this bill are to clarify that such  activities
are  absolutely prohibited, to provide mechanisms by which such
interference  can  be  stopped  in  a  timely  fashion  and  to
authorize  significant  penalities  for  such behavior. if this
proves insufficient, i am prepared to  introduce  even  tougher
legislation to further increase the penalties for violation and
include,  for  example,  mandatory  disqualification  of  those
convicted  from  being licensees in the future." goldwater said
he hoped that this would not be necessary.

at this point, goldwater  referred  to  several  amateur  radio
cases of willful and malicious interference including:

        -  transmission  of  unmodulated   carriers,   recorded
material  music  and  threats,  made  directly over the ongoing
transmissions of other operators (harold r.  claypoole,  n6bii,
1983)

        -  long,  continuous  transmission  of  computer  voice
synthesized  audio  signal  or  ticking clock on repeater input
frequency (henry c.  armsrong, wa6cgi, 1983).

        - initiation of transmissions when others were  already
using  the  frequency,  including  changes  in  frequency which
coincided with changes made by parties attempting  to evade the
interference (kenneth l. gilbert, kb6tg, 1982)

        - whistling on frequency for a long period of time  for
jamming purposes (donald e. miller, callsign unknown, 1978)

these cases illustrate  examples  of  the  type  of  purposeful
interference which this bill prohibits." goldwater said that he
didn't intend to limit the definition of the  bill's  terms  to
these activities "but rather to explain the type of behavior to
which the bill is addressed."

interference to home electronic entertainment equipment was not
addressed  in  the bill. goldwater said he recognized that some
interference is suffered by stereo amplifiers, television  sets
and  telephones  when they are operating near an operaing radio
transmitter.  he  cautioned  that  he  did  not  want  s.2975's
provisions  to  be construed as applying to interference caused
by susceptibility of equipment to rf energy.  "more often  than
not  the  problem is caused by the improper design of equipment
experiencing he interference," goldwater said.

s.2975 will elevate willful and  malicious  interference  to  a
criminal  offense pursuant to section 501 of the communications
act. this section provides for both a fine of up to $10,000 and
imprisonment  of  up to 1 year for a first offense and the same
fine and up to 2 years imprisonment for repeated offenses.

       (from gateway)