[net.ham-radio] Leaky CATV interferes with John Q. Public

parnass@ihu1h.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) (10/23/84)

     Leaky CATV	Equipment Interferes With Scanner User

A non-ham scanner friend from  Westmont	 (Illinois)  related
this  tale of grief caused by CATV signals (he is not a	CATV
subscriber):

      "In August 1984, a storm dropped several	heavy  bran-
     ches  onto	 the cable trunk line in my alley.  New	York
     channel 9 appeared	on my channel 4.   The	UHF  Atlanta
     superstation  came	 in on channel 13.  Manipulating the
     tuner controls on	my  (35	 channel)  cable  ready	 VCR
     brought  in HBO, Showtime,	Cable News Network and other
     cable services with varying levels	of snow	 and  inter-
     mod.   Worse  yet,	 regular  Chicago stations now had a
     ghost  caused  by	the   cable   retransmission   being
     microwaved	 around	 first	thus  being rebroadcast	mil-
     liseconds behind the direct  receptions.	Finally,  my
     scanner was being jammed all over the spectrum."

      "A call to the FCC brought a 'don't disturb my bureau-
     cratic  games,  what  do you want me to do, be a public
     servant?' attitude.  I called the FAA as  they  have  a
     remote  control sight at nearby Downers Grove/Woodridge
     in	case their system was getting interference.  A	call
     to	 the  local cable company office confirmed my suspi-
     cion that employees were never trained about  a  closed
     circuit  'broadcasting'.	Besides,  a service call was
     rejected by their computer	because	I was not a subscri-
     ber."

      "I located the regional cable company office in a	city
     it	did not	serve.	From their operator, I found out the
     name of the Chief Engineer	who did	not return my  call.
     I	sent  a	 certified  letter to him citing chapter and
     paragraph of the FCC  regulations.	  I  established  my
     right  as	a  user	of the electromagnetic spectrum	as a
     broadcast watcher (scanner	owners	have  no  rights  as
     they  are	not  the  intended  recipient normally)	that
     could not watch non-local stations	anymore	as  well  as
     having    regular	  channels    ghosted.......	That
     [registered letter] brought results, a  call  from	 the
     Construction   and	  Repair  Chief	 besides  the  Chief
     Engineer."

      "I had prepared for this by walking several blocks  in
     all  directions  with  a  portable	 scanner to find the
     point of highest signal strength.	The cable  company's
     sweeps  were inconclusive because they used a wide	band
     measuring device.	Thus, they measured up to 6 MHz	of a
     public safety/business band spectrum.  About 100 police
     and fire departments and 1000 business users masked any
     meaningful	 meter	reading.   After replacing first the
     connectors, then the 4-drop couple	and  finally  a	 500
     foot  section  of trunk cable, the	interference cleared
     up."

      "A  nearby  ham  continued  to   suffer	interference
     however.	He is a	subscriber" and	"had added a section
     of	coaxial	cable to the cable  connecting	his  TV	 set
     with  his	VCR.  That cable purchased at a	handy neigh-
     borhood national electronics  chain  store.....did	 not
     have  a 100% shield...." [so it allowed CATV signals to
     radiate around his	own house].
-- 
===============================================================================
Bob Parnass,  Bell Telephone Laboratories - ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass - (312)979-5414 

karn@mouton.UUCP (10/23/84)

Regarding leaky CATV systems...I have an item which should appear in QST
Hints & Kinks soon about a way of locating it.

A 2-meter SSB receiver is about the most sensitive device I know of for
detecting CATV leakage. I also found that the doppler shift caused by
vehicle motion is quite readily apparent on a mobile SSB transceiver
as you drive past the offending spot.  Finally! A practical use
for all that Relativity Physics you learned in school.

Phil