[net.followup] RFI & Terminals

karn (10/25/82)

I have learned a good deal about this topic, because I have been both
the generator and the victim of computer RFI.  I am an active amateur radio
operator interested in computers, and as such have torn my hair out many
times when trying to use my home computer in persuit of my hobby,
especially when receiving very weak signals from satellites.

Anyway, the rules are like this:  All new computer equipment manufactured
after a certain date (I don't know exactly when offhand) must be
certified by the manufacturer as complying with either "Class A" or
"Class B" emission limits.  A device intended for a commercial
environment (a VAX, for example) will have to meet Class A.
Class B requirements, which are MORE strict, will have to be met by
computing devices intended for residential environments (games, personal
computers, etc).  The FCC allows uncertified equipment to be
manufactured up to the deadline, but requires a warning notice to be placed on
the equipment that says, in effect, that the equipment may cause
interference if used in a residential area and that the owner would be
required to take whatever steps are necessary to correct any interference.
For a sample of this notice, look in those little plastic pockets on the
back door of any VAX made in the last two years or so.

Many newer terminals are coming out that are certified as meeting either
the Class A or B RFI limits.  My home terminal, the Heath H-19A, meets
the B limits. It can be operated ten feet away from a TV with rabbit
ears and not generate any RFI.  Unfortunately, retrofitting earlier
terminals to make them RFI tight is much more difficult than designing
it into the terminal to begin with.

It has ALWAYS been the case that the owner of any device (whether intended
to be a radio transmitter or not) that interferes with another service by
radiating energy within the frequencies assigned to the other service has
the legal responsibility to correct the problem.  You'd be amazed at the
variety of non-communications devices that can radiate objectionable
amounts of RF: computers, terminals, power lines, oil burners, microwave
ovens, electric motors, etc.

This is not to be confused with interference caused by the inability of
a device to reject authorized transmissions to which it isn't supposed to
respond, e.g., a record player that picks up a local amateur radio
transmitter.  President Reagan recently signed a bill that gives the FCC
to set rules requiring the manufacturers of home entertainment electronics
meet certain minimal standards for the rejection of out-of-band RF
energy.

Hope this helps.

Phil Karn, KA9Q
BTL Murray Hill

jcwinterton (11/01/82)

Just a side note in this.  This week, I noticed that my ti59 calculator
radiated quite a lot of static on the AM broadcast radio band.  Holy cow,
doesn't anyone shield anything?
John Winterton.

ignatz (11/01/82)

	Golly, mentioning the TI calculator interference brings back memories.
Surely I'm not the only one who remembers that the HP-35 would affect an AM
radio on a per-keystroke basis?  This little beast actually produced 'notes'
that were clean enough to play tunes.  My HP-45 did this as well, but the tones
were not discrete enough to play tunes. However, you could--and I did--use this
to tell when a program was done!  While running a program, you also had an
increase in generated noise; when the program was done, the output level went
down.  I could even tell when it was in loops...
	Incidentally, this was never resolved to my satisfaction, but I think
the EE's said they thought that the calculator was affecting the IF, not the
primary frequencies...
~a
~v
(sheesh.)
				Dave Ihnat
				ihuxx!ignatz

wagner (11/02/82)

Airlines typically get very upset about people generating 
RFI onboard planes (dont turn on your CB radio) - I wonder
how they feel about calculators like John Wintertons or the
new several-megahertz pocket micros?
Michael Wagner, UTCS

wagner (11/03/82)

Our 370/165 used to play tunes in the short wave band.  We used to listen to
it sometimes at night while we were making coffee.  You could tell when
the assembly was finished and the machine was idling by the change in
the roughness (not the frequency) of the note it played.

Strange what amuses small minds late at night while benchmarking.

Michael Wagner, UTCS

doehring (11/03/82)

	Don't forget that a while back ( and maybe still ) you were
NOT ALLOWED to use hand held calculators on board a commercial airline, 
since the RFI emitted interferred with the NAVIGATION equipment, I guess 
that this is one way to hijack an airplane....

					Martin S. Doehring 
					decvax!yale-comix!doehring
					doehring@YALE

dmmartindale (11/03/82)

I read of a case not long ago where an airliner at cruising altitude lost
all VHF voice communications with the ground.  When flying IFR, this is
quite serious, even if enough of their navigation gear was still working
so that they knew where they were.  The culprit turned out to be one of
the passengers playing one of those pocket electronic games.

jim (11/03/82)

My first computer was an IBM 1130, in about 1968, and the thing that
impressed me most about it was that they had a program which would play "The
Stars and Stripes Forever" through any nearby AM radio.  It worked by
running various timing loops -- the longer the loop, the longer it took to
execute and the lower the pitch of the resulting tone.  It made such an
impression that I decided to make computers my life's work.

tjr (11/03/82)

At the University of Illinois physics computer (circa 1971), we had
an IBM 7094. One of the operators (who often worked the nearly-idle
night shift) wrote a "music compiler", which used accumulator loops
with varying increments to play tunes through an ordinary AM radio
placed on the console. He had the capability for 3-note chords,
arbitrary rhythms, etc. The compiler was written in FORTRAN.

The most spectacular piece of computer music I have ever heard
was his version of the 1812 Overture. It lasted about 6 minutes,
and included squealing tape-drives for the carillons, and massive
overprintings on the printer for cannons. Synthesizer-music just
can't come close to the bald incongruity of this crazy computer
playing Tchaikovsky!

		Tom Roberts
		..ihps3!ihnet!tjr

terryl (11/03/82)

     Well, when I first started programming, I knew a person who programmed
an IBM 1130(gasp! How archaic) to play music by running a program and placing
an ordinary AM radio on the console. The sound was something you had to hear
to appreciate!!!!

henry (11/03/82)

Best be very careful about causing interference with aircraft navigation
or communications.  This is one area where the feds will jump on you with
both feet, *regardless* of whose equipment is technically to blame.

leichter (11/04/82)

Well, since all the old tales are coming out...back on the ol' IBM 1620, you
could generate reasonably clean notes on a nearby AM radio with carefully
built loops.  I heard a couple of "concerts" done this way.  It got pretty
popular at one point, and the SHARE catalogue for the 1620 listed a number
of "music compilers".  One of the most sophisticated, called something like
"Maestro", understood standard musical notation (in some "linearized" format)
including repeats.  It generated a program that played the music, accompanying
itself on the paper tape punch for percussion!

And then there was "printer music".  I only heard this once.  On some model
printer or other (IBM) a number of years back, with careful selection of
the stuff you were printing, you could get notes out of the rubbing of the
chain against the paper, or something.  Again, there were compilers.

'Twas impressive nor for the quality but that it was done at all!
						-- Jerry
					decvax!yale-comix!leichter
					leichter@yale

bcw (11/04/82)

From:	Bruce C. Wright @ Duke University
Re:	Computer music

I've heard of several things like this done;  on the Sigma V which we used
to have at the Duke Medical Center, there was a programmable audio alarm
which was used by someone (I think from the user's group, it wasn't locally)
to write "music" - it too had something of a "music compiler" which was
based on the macro assembler.  The only thing I remember for it was a medley
of popular tunes which ran for maybe 10 minutes.  Some of the people at XDS
reportedly tied the audio alarm to the crash routine in the system to produce
"a 20-second descending whistle," but unfortunately I never heard or saw that
one except by reputation.

Also, there was a program on one of the old IBM-1130 computers which would
use the line printer (printing lines of different characters which had a
different pitch for each type of character) which played "Anchors Aweigh"
(I think it was written locally by one of the computer freak types who may
be listening in on this - I don't think I'll embarrass him by giving names).

			Bruce C. Wright @ Duke University

wagner (11/04/82)

HMMMM ... I thought there was a way of taking your OSBORNE
on the plane and using it (a battery option or something).
I guess they wouldnt appreciate that!

Michael Wagner, UTCS

david@sri-unix (11/04/82)

I realize that this can't compare with IBM machines playing the 1812
Overture, but I used to work with Nicolet Zeta pen plotters, and we
had a diamond-shape test pattern that just by chance generated an
(almost) scale - something to do with varying the distance of wher
the pen carriage was on the wire.
		David Brown
		Varian

jdd (11/04/82)

Well, when \I/ first started programming, we had an IBM 7040 that
could play tunes over the radio \and/ an IBM 1401 that could play
tunes on its line printer.  Alas, although they shared an I/O
channel, they couldn't play duets!

Cheers,
John ("I never sign my middle name") DeTreville
Bell ("Information Age") Labs, Murray Hill

rcf (11/04/82)

The 1401 could also play tunes on the radio,
as I heard with my own ears --
Now if someone had just had it play the line printer
and the radio at the same time ...

Robert Field
Qume, San Jose

pcmcgeer (11/04/82)

	With justification.  If a pilot's radio goes out when he is in a PCZ
or a VTA he and his aircraft are in big trouble.  Forget the feds: the
pilot will jump on you with both feet, and, left to himself, would toss
you out at 35,000.
						Rick.

lsk (11/05/82)

In college we had a program that turned the computer console into a
piano keyboard! Of course, we only allowed the talented operatorts to
play tunes (you can only stand so much chopsticks). We had an IBM 360/44
and the radio had to go somewhere on the top of the CPU, as I recall.

Speaking of the 360/44; did anyone else use/know of them? We were told
it was a machine IBM usually marketed in EUROPE and that our having mit
made us unique? WOnder if that was bull? 'Course, they never told us how
WE got one!!!

Larry S. Kaufman , Western Electric Co, Network SOftware Center, Lisle, IL

tbm (11/06/82)

How well I remember the HP2100 playing music on a card stuck in the
paper tape reader.  Love to listen to it and adjust the card to
change the 'fi' (as in HiFi).

		Tom Merrick

davy (11/06/82)

#R:eagle:-57300:pur-ee:4500004:000:345
pur-ee!davy    Nov  5 10:44:00 1982


	Someone told me a story about a guy who found out you could make
	"music" by having the line printer print various characters.....

	He slept something off so it would run about 3:00 in the morning, 
	the poor operator on duty at that time suddenly became aware of
	his printer playing "The Halls of Montezuma".....

--Dave Curry
pur-ee!davy

goutal (01/04/83)

Catching up on 'old news'...
Note that there used to be a program for the PDP-12 (and -8, too)
that would produce AM music you could listen to on a nearby AM radio.
I'm sure other machines had such programs.
(Yes, this is getting far afield from RFI and *terminals*).
Today, I believe, the FCC frowns on this sort of thing.  Sigh.

The -12 also had a speaker (!) connected to the link (carry) bit,
for some reason or other, and it turned out mighty handy for the same
reason as the fellow mentioned about his HP-45 -- tracking the progress
of one's program (of course, there were front panels in those days, too,
that told you a lot).

Moving back into the realm of possibly dangerous, or at least noxious,
radiation... Does anyone remember working with the old Data General
machines (circa 1973... maybe even still!)?  For those of you who don't,
I remember being able to tell what stage of compiling or linking my
program had gotten to, simply from the whine of the power supply.
And I don't mean that ours was in bad repair;  it was the normal behaviour
of the 8xx and 12xx Nova series, due, I believe, to the use of switching-
type power supplies (I may have this a bit adrift... it's been a while
since I understood much about hardware) -- the effect was similar to
the flyback whine in some (especially older) TV's.  Note that this was
not just *faint*, either!  I could do that trick of telling what it
was doing from several offices down the hall!

Anyhow, it used to give me a headache, and I took to wearing airport-
type silencing muffs.

Amazing the lengths some companies will go to to compete!
-- Kenn (decvax!)goutal

goutal (01/04/83)

Another late entry, this time about using an OSBORNE on an airplane.
(Hope this isn't a repeat.)
Recently, in HUMANETTES or TELECOM or someplace,
an article was posted about how some company was planning to supply
airlines with in-flight data-terminal service for passengers.
Either they found a way to beat the rap,
or we're gonna see a lot of planes coming down in unexpected places!
-- Kenn (decvax!)goutal