ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) (06/08/91)
EFFector Online|EFFector Online|EFFector Online|EFFector Online
EFFector Online|EFFector Online|EFFector Online|EFFector Online
Volume 1 Issue:1.07
Friday June 14, 1991
SENATE ANTI-ENCRYPTION BILL WITHDRAWN
WILL BE REPLACED BY A NEW OMNIBUS CRIME BILL -- S.1241
SENSE OF CONGRESS LANGUAGE RESTRICTING ENCRYPTION REMOVED
When Senate Bill 266 was proposed, some of its provisions would have
restricted the rights of individuals to secure online communications
through the use of encryption programs. The specific language was:
"It is the sense of Congress that providers of
electronic communications services and manufacturers
of electronic communications service equipment shall
ensure that communications systems permit the
government to obtain the plain text contents of voice,
data, and other communications when appropriately
authorized by law."
Let stand, this language would have a chilling effect on encryption.
It would inevitably compromise individual privacy in telecommunications.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and several other groups determined
to oppose this provision.
In the last issue of EFFector Online, we reported we would register
our opposition to this clause. In this case, Senator Patrick Leahy (D.
Vermont), who chairs the sub-committee on Technology and the Law --a
sub-set of the Senate Judiciary Committee-- was the key to this issue.
This week the EFF met with Leahy's staff to present our reasons for
the removal of the language dealing with encryption. Today, we were
informed that the encryption clause has been eliminated from the new
crime bill which replaced the bill originally known as S.266. In
addition, Leahy's sub-committee on Technology and the Law has undertaken
to study the issues of encryption and telecommunications technology.
To continue this dialogue, Computer Professionals for Social
Responsibility, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and RSA will be
holding an invitational workshop on privacy and encryption in Washington
later this month. Following the workshop, a press conference will be
held to announce a set of policy recommendations on cryptography.
The conference will take place on Monday at 2:00 at the National
Press Club (14th & Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.). All interested parties
are invited to attend.
-==--==--==-<>-==--==--==-
Please direct all mail regarding EFFector Online to:
editors@eff.org
--
Christopher Davis, System Manager & Postmaster, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Email -- Domain: <ckd@eff.org>, Bangist: <{uunet,bu.edu,...}!world!eff!ckd>
Snail Mail: 155 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141 - PSTN: +1 617 864 1550
[ For information on the EFF, mail me or ftp to eff.org (192.88.144.3) ]wayner@CS.Cornell.EDU (Peter Wayner) (06/14/91)
ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes: > To continue this dialogue, Computer Professionals for Social >Responsibility, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and RSA will be >holding an invitational workshop on privacy and encryption in Washington >later this month. Following the workshop, a press conference will be >held to announce a set of policy recommendations on cryptography. > The conference will take place on Monday at 2:00 at the National >Press Club (14th & Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.). All interested parties >are invited to attend. Can anyone report on this meeting? Did anything interesting happen? And what does the subject line "loses First Round" mean? Is there a second round scheduled? -Peter -- Peter Wayner Department of Computer Science Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY 14850 EMail:wayner@cs.cornell.edu Office: 607-255-9202 or 255-1008 Home: 116 Oak Ave, Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone: 607-277-6678
ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) (06/15/91)
PW> == Peter Wayner <wayner@CS.Cornell.EDU>
PW> Can anyone report on this meeting? Did anything interesting happen?
A full report is being worked on and will be posted soon (the people who
were there were also at a conference in Arizona, so they just got back).
PW> And what does the subject line "loses First Round" mean? Is there
PW> a second round scheduled?
The provision has only been stricken from this bill. The subcommittee
could conceivably recommend that it be put in a later bill (but we feel
this is unlikely).
--Chris
--
Christopher Davis - System Manager & Postmaster, Electronic Frontier Foundation
<ckd@eff.org> <{uunet,bu.edu,...}!world!eff!ckd> NeXT: <ckd@black-cube.eff.org>
155 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141 - +1 617 864 0665 - FAX: +1 617 864 0866
"Internet mail headers are not unlike giblets." - Paul Vixie <vixie@pa.dec.com>