[net.followup] Christmas

soreff (12/20/82)

One item that got left out of the "green christmas" discussion is that
christmas is really a ~druid holiday. Most of the things associated with
christmas (mistletoe, christmas tree, yule log) are northern-european-pagan
in origin. I recall reading (sorry, no reference availible) that the church
picked the date of christmas in order to compete with pagan celebrations at
that time of year.		-Jeffrey Soreff (hplabs!soreff)

wsp (12/23/82)

I concur that Christmas is at essence non-denominational but I 
question whether it is fair to label it druid in one breath and 
"northern-european-pagan" in the next.

On another tack, I am interested in outting some of the paganism back in
Christmas and would welcome any authentic (preferably non-sacrificial or
homocidal) rites that our "northern-european-pagan"s (NEPs) performed
at the winter solstice.

Peter Benson
ittdcd-west
(619)578-3080

mclure (01/01/83)

#R:hplabsb:-123300:sri-unix:7300005:000:241
sri-unix!mclure    Dec 28 08:20:00 1982

Hmm, I always thought that Dec 25 in the Julian calendar was the winter
solstice and this was the cause of the celebration, rebirth of
the sun, etc. Then, the Christians adopted this day for their Christ
and things have followed since then.

rah (01/03/83)

Easter is directly linked to the Jewish holy day of passover.
More generally, Christianity became the state religion of the roman
empire, so I would expect that some observances were a merger of some
roman pagan holiday with a Christian excuse for a celebration.
Rich Hammond, npoiv!rah

wagner (01/03/83)

So when was Jesus actually born?

jhf (01/04/83)

utcsstat!wagner asks when Jesus was really born (if not December 25
or January 6).  As I understand it, He was probably born in the spring,
since St. Matthew tells us that shepherds were keeping watch over their
flocks by night, and that such watches were kept only in spring, when
there are lambs about.

rew (01/04/83)

An interesting question.  One could insist that he was born
in 1 A.V.D. (that's True Year of our Lord) but that would be begging
the question.

My understanding is that the best guess is the Spring of 6 B.C. (current
convention).  This is based on several bits of information such
as when Herod was King of Judea, when Augustus was Ceasar, when
Quirinius was governor of Syria, when the Empire imposed taxes,
and so on.  The season is derived from the fact that shepards of
the period tended their flocks by night in the Spring during lambing.

It also fits in with an interesting hypothesis about the "Star" of
Bethlehem.  One starts with the assumption that the Magi were in
fact Zoroastrian priests from the area now known as Iran.
This relgious group was (and still is, probably) intensely interested
in astrological events.  Among the events of early 6 B.C. was a thrice
repeated conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in the constellation Pisces
(known to the Zoroastrians as the House of the Hebrews).  This was followed by
a triple conjunction with Mars.  One can imagine intense interest on their part
as to just what monumental event was occurring in Judea at the time.

Bob Warren
cbosgd!nscs!rew

jhf (01/05/83)

Earlier, I attributed the account of shepherds watching over their flocks
by night to St. Matthew.  Of course, that should be St. Luke.

heliotis (01/07/83)

Jesus was born sometime in 4 B.C., they say.

rich (01/12/83)

 
Jesus was born on or about:   MARCH 4BCE
 
So what's BCE? It is the proper terminology. We use BC as Before Christ
when it NEVER meant that. BCE is Before the Christian Era.

jnwVAL (01/13/83)

I find it amazing that people will submit articles to net.followup, or for
that matter any net group and make misleading statements without having
done thorough research.

In (tektronix.892) we are told (incorrectly) that BC `NEVER meant [before
Christ].' The Second College Edition of the Webster New World Dictionary
lists `Before Christ' and `British Columbia' as its only two meanings for
B.C.  I think you can guess which one is relevant here.

In (yale-com.644) we are told (misleadingly) that `BCE != Before the
Christian Era.' While Webster does indeed list B.C.E. as meaning `Before
the Common Era', if one looks up `Common Era', one finds it is `same as [in
italics] Christian Era.'  I don't think it too much to ask that we accept
either of these as a reasonable meaning.

My point??  Although we cannot prevent net discussions which some will feel
are garbage,  we can prevent incorrect or misleading statements from being
sent.  Before providing answers to net questions, and especially before
flaming, please make sure your facts are straight.

				joe wilson
				uucp:  ...decvax!duke!mcnc!uvacs!jnwVAL
				CSnet: jnwVAL@uvacs
				Arpa:  jnwVAL.uvacs@udel-relay