roelofs@amelia.nas.nasa.gov (Cave Newt) (08/13/90)
At least at this site (amelia.nas.nasa.gov in California), the first part
of the recent c.b.os2 posting of patch was slightly munged. Six lines of
the uuencoded posting, between roughly lines 400 and 500 of the original
article (including headers), were split. Reconcatenating the (obvious)
pieces fixes the problem ("zoo -test" checks out OK). The lines look like:
MQ`O223HA9?:\((P:
5,$LO_47DU=RI(L=]"9,@61`%=H`9^0,#!(O=L<XW"MN
M"SDQ&<]C!5BR"$1)&)D:<&1J
@2#JK=QQ$`^B@UJ(Z0D$J(%*!@):(B6YBM+N
M````````````<&%T8V@N8P````````H`
?Z_Z`````````````$`I(R@``,>@
M5:E6!QO99=1&71ZA]EFC'F%:QEGNNMJFQ[**#%,.=^:X&(TS
W+#3@`FZ?![,
M[
48U8&4SS_.X1S7)/TG`R*/6PAHYN&6H:8@#8?\*`M&1;HE'[`UPA&*4=(FA
M5*+&N<Q4#
H,_]\GGH:[ASU(.=%G.4F@_IX#,B5XB?],,1SDBVLP3@\X7T
*:&
Since I haven't seen any other complaints, perhaps this is a very local
(or just very trivial? :) ) problem. If so, apologies for wasting band-
width....goodearl@world.std.com (Robert Goodearl) (08/24/90)
The above article failed to pass brik when it arrived. Would someone be willing to mail it to me? (Let me know if you are and I'll let you know to mail it to me, so as to avoid duplicate mailings.) Thanks. -- Bob Goodearl -- goodearl@world.std.com