curtism@uncw.UUCP (mike curtis) (08/01/90)
Lets start a new games group called comp.sys.ibm.games. I know that there are thousands of you fellow netters that play games, so lets start a new group that deals only with games! I really don't know how to start a new group, but I thought if I started some disscusion on the subject it would get the ball rolling. Please e-mail me if you are interested in this new group, also post any comments or help about starting a new group. COME ON EVERYONE lets get this group together, after all event the Amiga has a games group, but then again that's what toys are for :-). If you have any questions or comments I would like to hear from you. Lets do it.
kramer@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu (08/02/90)
In article <855@uncw.UUCP>, curtism@uncw.UUCP (mike curtis) writes: > Lets start a new games group called comp.sys.ibm.games. I know that > there are thousands of you fellow netters that play games, so lets > start a new group that deals only with games! Sounds good. Anyone else interested? I'll check to see what we have to do to start a newsgroup. E r i c kramer@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) (08/03/90)
In article <855@uncw.UUCP> curtism@uncw.UUCP (mike curtis) writes: > > Lets start a new games group called comp.sys.ibm.games. I know that There already exists a games hierarchy in rec.games. Check it out. Let's leave comp groups for computing. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@druid) | D'Arcy Cain Consulting | MS-DOS: The Andrew Dice Clay West Hill, Ontario, Canada | of operating systems. + 416 281 6094 |
tanida@odin.css.gov (Tom Tanida) (08/03/90)
I'll vote yes on that- with the growing market of computer games, this topic deserves its own board- plus we wont have to flood rec.games.video (mostly Nintendo, Atari, Sega). -Tom
roy@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) (08/04/90)
tanida@odin.css.gov (Tom Tanida) writes: > > I'll vote yes on that- with the growing market of computer games, this > topic deserves its own board- plus we wont have to flood > rec.games.video (mostly Nintendo, Atari, Sega). OK, right idea, wrong hierarchy. If you don't want rec.games.video congested, create rec.games.ibm.pc. I will vote NO on comp.anything.games! It's not the correct place for it. ^^^^^^^^ -- Roy M. Silvernail | #include <stdio.h> | Does virtual now available at: | main(){ | reality need cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu | float x=1; | swap space? (cyberspace... be here!)| printf("Just my $%.2f.\n",x/50);} | -- me
dlou@dino.ucsd.edu (Dennis Lou) (08/04/90)
In article <1q0BN2w162w@cybrspc> cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) writes: >tanida@odin.css.gov (Tom Tanida) writes: >> I'll vote yes on that- with the growing market of computer games, this >> topic deserves its own board- plus we wont have to flood >> rec.games.video (mostly Nintendo, Atari, Sega). > >OK, right idea, wrong hierarchy. If you don't want rec.games.video >congested, create rec.games.ibm.pc. > >I will vote NO on comp.anything.games! It's not the correct place for >it. ^^^^^^^^ TOo late! comp.sys.mac.games already exists! -- Dennis Lou Disclaimer: I don't use lame disks. dlou@dino.ucsd.edu "But Yossarian, what if everyone thought that way?" [backbone]!ucsd!dino!dlou "Then I'd be crazy to think any other way!" -- Dennis Lou Disclaimer: I don't use lame disks. dlou@dino.ucsd.edu "But Yossarian, what if everyone thought that way?" [backbone]!ucsd!dino!dlou "Then I'd be crazy to think any other way!"