[net.ham-radio] Gateway V. 1 No. 23

jak@mtunh.UUCP (Jim Kutsch) (07/12/85)

Gateway: The ARRL Packet-Radio Newsletter
 Volume 1, Issue 23
 July 9, 1985

 Published by:
 ARRL
 225 Main Street
 Newington, CT 06111
 203-666-1541

 Editor:
 Jeffrey W. Ward, K8KA



 PACKET RADIO USED IN FIGHTING BRUSH FIRES

 [The following is a report filed by Wally Linstruth, WA6JPR from
 an ongoing emergency operation.  It is meant to convey the
 initial experiences of using a new, potentially formidable
 technology under emergency conditions.]

 Packet radio is playing an important role in aiding firefighters
 involved with the Wheeler Gorge forest fire that is still raging
 in the forests and brushlands east of Santa Barbara, CA.  Bill
 Talanian, W1UUQ, President of the Santa Barbara Amateur Radio
 Club, reports that over 200 messages have been cleared from the
 fire area in the last few days.  The traffic consists of
 approximately 50 percent health and welfare and 50 percent
 official fire department disaster-coordination messages for relay
 to the northern part of the state.

 The WESTNET digipeater system and the W6IXU mailbox are being
 used for much of the traffic. Traffic is also being cleared to
 NTS through Los Angeles area hams and WESTNET.

 The versatility and simplicity of the simplex digipeater was
 proven when the KA6SOX-1 Painted Cave digipeater was easily moved
 to La Cumbre peak for a better path into Pendola Camp, the main
 fire control  point. A duplex repeater was also rapidly converted
 to a digipeater to enhance WESTNET coverage of the fire area.

 All is not roses, however, and we will have much more to report
 after the conclusion of the current activity.  The problems
 uncovered during this emergency will provide serious food for
 thought for the packet-radio community.  Two problems that have
 already been identified are:

 o Line-by-line entry is tedious and error prone. This is
 compounded by the fact that (at least here) the people involved
 in packet technology are not uniformly well trained in emergency
 traffic-handling procedures. Also, the well-trained ARES
 operators are not familiar with the details of TNC operation.
 This problem was handled by W1UUQ who received most outbound
 traffic at his home where the messages were reformatted using his
 word processor and retransmitted to their ultimate WESTNET
 destinations.

 o  The California State emergency agencies have been convinced
 that packet is superior to means of sending messages.  Because of
 this, state-purchased packet gear was being used in preference to
 ordinary traffic-handling methods, even though it was obvious to
 the control operators that traditional methods were operating at
 higher efficiency. This situation got worse when the W6IXU
 mailbox became congested because there is not yet a "data
 highway" from packet into NTS.

 We can draw one moral from these experiences, even before the
 final report has been filed:  Make sure that you have a working
 packet-radio traffic-handling system before you "sell" packet to
 government authorities.

 Expect a more detailed report soon.

     From WA6JPR.


 PACKET AT THE JACKSON-HOLE HAMFEST

 The 1985 Wyoming-Idaho-Montana-Utah (WIMU) Hamfest, which will
 also be the ARRL Rocky Mountain Division Convention, has
 scheduled several packet-radio events.  The hamfest will be held
 in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 2-4.  Here is a tentative
 schedule of packet-radio happenings:

 Fri. 3 P.M. The Packet Radio hospitality room swings into action.

 Fri.  7 P.M.  All packeteers go to the Bar-J Ranch for a chuck-
 wagon dinner and Western variety show.

 Sat. 8 A.M.  Packet talks begin, continuing until 10 am. The
 primary speaker will be Pete Eaton, WB9FLW.

 Jackson Hole, at the doorstep of Yellowstone National Park, is a
 great place to take the family if you want a combination vacation
 and hamfest.  Plan your vacation so that you get both the best
 scenery and the most up to date packet radio information.

     From N7BHC.


 EMERGENCY LOCATION WITH PACKET RADIO

 Dave Pederson, N7BHC, suggests a potential public-service use for
 high-altitude digipeaters.  He  suggest that we develop an
 emergency locator transmitter (ELT) direction finding (DF)
 receiver be interconnected with a packet station.  Information
 from the DF receiver could be relayed via packet to search and
 rescue authorities.  The high-altitude sites occupied by many
 digipeaters would be quite good for receiving ELT beacons.

 A computer-controlled ELT DF system attached to a TNC could send
 out an emergency beacon whenever it heard an ELT (outside of
 standard testing times).  The system could then update DF
 information periodically or on command.  Dave provides further
 details of this idea in an article in the July issue of UPRA
 Connect.

     Via N7BHC.


 JAS-1 UPDATE

 JAS-1, the amateur radio satellite built by the Japanese Amateur
 Satellite Corp. (JAMSAT), is complete, and should be launched in
 August of 1986.  Along with a linear transponder operating with a
 2-meter uplink and a 70-cm downlink (mode J), JAS-1 will carry a
 "mode-JD" digital store-and-forward transponder.  This
 transponder will operate like an orbiting packet bulletin-board
 system (PBBS), and ground stations will use AX.25 TNCs and
 special modems to access the satellite.

 With two flight-ready satellites complete (a primary spacecraft
 and a backup), specifications of the mode-JD transponder are
 becoming available.  The following details come from the
 "Satellite Update" column in Amateur Radio Action, an Australian
 ham magazine.

 The transponder has four uplinks in the two-meter band and one
 downlink in the 70-cm band.  The single downlink will be able to
 keep up with multiple uplinks because there will be frequent
 uplink collisions between ground stations that can not hear each
 other.  The uplinks, on 145.85, 145.87, 145.89 and 147.91 MHz
 will use 1200-bit/s, Manchester coded FM.  The 435.91-MHz
 downlink, will use 1200-bit/s, non-return to zero inverted
 (NRZI), phase shift keying (PSK).

 While JAS-1 will probably be available to any appropriately-
 equipped ground station, it is likely that most stations will
 access the satellite through teleport stations.  The use of
 central teleports has several advantages:  users without
 satellite antennas will be able to take advantage of the
 satellite, time and money invested in building special modems
 will be reduced and contention for the satellite's uplink
 channels will be minimized.

 With JAS-1 mode JD, the RUDAK experiment on Phase 3-C and PACSAT
 all scheduled to be launched in the next year or so, the horizons
 of packet radio will soon be greatly expanded.

     Via Amateur Radio Action.


 ARRL COMMENTS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL

 The ARRL has filed comments on the FCC's proposal to extend
 automatic control to all amateur operations above 29.5 MHz (RM-
 4879).  Excerpts from the ARRL comments follow:

 "The League reaffirms its proposal that automatic control of
 digital communications be permitted on all amateur frequencies
 above 30 MHz as outlined in its Petition.  In the Notice [RM-
 4879], the Commission has built upon the League's request,
 proposing that 'any amateur station may be under automatic
 control, except where transmitting on frequencies below 29.5
 MHz.'  In order to carry out its broader proposal, the Commission
 proposes to modify its Rules dealing with third-party traffic.

 "It is unfortunate that the Commission has introduced the issue
 of third-party traffic into this proceeding.  It detracts from
 the primary purpose expressed in the Notice of keeping the
 amateur service abreast of technological developments such as
 computer-based message systems (CBMS) and other digital
 technologies.  The proposed third-party Rules also impose
 unnecessary and onerous restrictions on the development and
 operation of digital communications networks.  In fact, the
 proposal as presented in the Notice will not allow normal
 operation of CBMSs, which is contrary to one of the Commission's
 goals as stated in the Notice. What is supposedly allowed radio
 amateurs by permitting automatic control is at the same time
 taken away by a proposed blanket prohibition from transmitting
 third-party traffic by automatically controlled stations as
 explained below."

 The comments recall that the issue of third party traffic first
 came to importance in the late 1970s, with the growing use and
 abuse of repeater autopatches.  The casual use of autopatches
 lead the FCC to issue a news release in 1978 reading, in part,
 "Section 97.79(d) states that 'the licensee of an Amateur station
 may permit any third party to participate in Amateur radio
 communication from his station, provided that a control operator
 is present and continuously monitors and supervises the radio
 communications to insure compliance with the rules.'"  The
 Commission in the same notice also stated that section 97.79(d)
 clearly "prohibited autopatching and reverse autopatching through
 automatically controlled repeater stations and required a control
 operator to be on duty at all times during these operations."

 From  the ARRL comments:

 "What the Commission was seeking to guard against then was the
 origination and introduction of communications into the amateur
 radio medium by unlicensed individuals.

 "The commission misapplies this point in the [automatic control
 of digital communications] proposal, however, by seeking to
 prohibit 'third party traffic from any amateur radio station
 under automatic control.'  A similar potential for abuse by
 unlicensed individuals in a digital amateur radio system exists
 only at the point where the third-party traffic is originated and
 introduced into the amateur radio medium.  It is necessary to
 require a control operator at this stage only.  This control
 operator will guard against the potential abuse of amateur
 frequencies in a digital system just as effectively as the
 control operator on duty at a voice repeater station when an
 autopatch is accessed.  To impose the additional burden of a
 control operator at every point along the digital system, be it
 at a CBMS site or at every packet 'digipeater' along the path to
 the message's destination is unnecessary.  Such a requirement, in
 fact, would severely curtail the use of the developing digital
 technologies because the burden on control operators would be
 nearly impossible to shoulder.  For example, messages on a packet
 radio repeater are received at a rate of 1200 words per minute,
 and retransmitted immediately at the same rate.  This would
 require a control operator to examine each packet at a rate of
 600 words per minute to keep up with the throughput capability of
 such a repeater.  Furthermore, speeds higher than 1200 words per
 minute are authorized, and technology is advancing toward higher
 and higher speeds."

 After this, the comments address the common practice of using
 automatically controlled voice repeaters to pass third party
 traffic. In conclusion, the ARRL says:

 "We urge the Commission to modify its proposal so as not to
 impose a blanket prohibition of third-party traffic on stations
 operating under automatic control.  We believe that the best way
 to achieve the goal of promoting the developing technologies in
 digital communications is to leave section 97.79 intact with the
 possible exception of clarifying section 97.79(d) by [adding the
 following text]:

      'Participation    means   the    origination,
      introduction    or   reintroduction   of    a
      communication  into the amateur radio  medium
      by a third party.'

 "The proposed addition of this language to section 97.79(d) has
 the added benefit of clarifying that a control operator is
 required during operation of simplex autopatches.

 "It is further urged that the proposed Rule sections 97.80(c) and
 97.114(d) not be adopted, and that the Commission instead adopt
 the wording of 97.80, as originally proposed by the League, as
 follows:

 "97.80 Automatic Control of Digital Communications.

      'Amateur Radio Stations may be operated under
      automatic control on frequencies above 30 MHz
      when    utilizing   digital    communications
      pursuant to section 97.69,  provided that the
      control   functions  include   (i)   adequate
      provision   for   detection  of   transmitter
      malfunction and discontinuance of transmitter
      operation  in the event such  malfunction  is
      detected;    (ii)   devices   installed   and
      procedures  implemented to ensure  compliance
      with  the rules when a duty control  operator
      is  not  present  at a control point  of  the
      station.  Upon notification by the Commission
      of  improper  operation of  a  station  under
      automatic control,  operation under automatic
      control  shall  be  immediately  discontinued
      until all deficiencies have been corrected.

 "THEREFORE, the foregoing considered, the League recommends that
 the Commission extend automatic control to amateur digital
 communications above 30 MHz.  The League also requests that the
 proposed blanket prohibition of third-party traffic transmitted
 on automatically-controlled stations not be adopted, and it urges
 that section 97 be amended by the adoption of section 97.80 as
 originally proposed by the League."

     Ed.


 NORTHWEST NEWS

 The following update on the Northwest Amateur Packet Radio
 Association (NAPRA) comes from John Hayes, KD7UW, NAPRA's
 Technical Vice President.

 "There is currently a network operating in Seattle on 145.010
 MHz. In order to reduce the frequency of collisions and bring
 some organization to the frequency, use of the WN7ANK-5
 digipeater is mandatory.  Stations that can connect without the
 digipeater are encouraged to move to 145.050 MHz.

 "Northern Idaho and  eastern Washington are now also served by a
 145.010-MHz digipeater, N7BI-4 on Mica Peak.  Again, the
 suggested simplex channel is 145.050 MHz.  The packeteers
 responsible for the N7BI digipeater are affiliated with NAPRA and
 work with us on network coordination.  To facilitate this, we
 hold an HF net on 3885 Khz, Thursday at 8 P.M. Pacific Time.

 "Doug Lux, WB6VAC, has been advocating the use of a 'channel-
 busy' signal to reduce the number of collisions at digipeater
 receivers.  The packet repeater with a busy signal will, like a
 duplex repeater, use two frequencies.  Whenever it is receiving a
 packet, it will transmit a busy signal on its transmit frequency.
 This signal will be recognized by stations using the repeater,
 and they will not transmit when they hear the busy signal.  Once
 a packet has been completely received by the repeater, it will be
 regenerated (as in a digipeater) and retransmitted.  The repeater
 with busy signal is addressed just like a digipeater.  This
 addressing and the regeneration of packets before they are
 repeated may make the proposed system superior to a standard
 duplex repeater.  WB6VAC will be experimenting to find out if the
 system works well.

 "We are working on expanding our  network into Oregon, which is
 where we will meet WESTNET.  A site in Longview, Washington,  has
 been located, and we are working to put in a digipeater there.
 Longview 'sees' Portland, Oregon. The Utah Packet Radio
 Association (UPRA) and the Boise, Idaho, group are working to
 connect with us through the Pullman, Washington/Moscow, Idaho
 area.  South-central Washington should be on the air later this
 summer.  We also hope to work with VADCG to get a true Gateway
 into their 145.65-MHz network, which uses the V-2 protocol."

     Via HAMNET.


 PACKET FOR THE COMMODORE 64

 The manufacturer of the PKT-1, Advanced Electronics Applications
 (AEA) will be announcing a packet-radio adapter for the C 64
 sometime this fall.  The adapter will plug into the C 64 like any
 other program cartridge, and it will provide AX.25 protocol
 software, a terminal emulator program and a modem.  Transmission
 and reception of HDLC frames will be handled by hardware.  To
 provide enhanced HF operation, AEA may use something other than
 the common EXAR IC modem.  How much will it cost?  Around $200,
 but the price has not been set yet.  When will it be available?
 This fall, probably sometime in September.

     Via WB9FLW, AEA.


 TAPR PROJECT STATUS

 The TAPR TNC 2 is in the "final stages" of beta testing, with the
 hardware completely debugged and the final version of the
 software distributed to the dozen beta testers.  The manual, one
 of the most demanding aspects of the project, is almost complete.
 It looks like initial estimates of "late summer or early fall"
 for availability of the first 300 TNCs were fairly accurate.  The
 process of announcing the availability of the TNC 2 and then
 taking orders for it will be tightly controlled.  When TAPR is
 ready to take orders, electronic messages will be posted on DRNET
 and Compuserve HAMNET.  Orders will be taken over the telephone,
 and only one order per person and one order per phone call will
 be accepted.  No COD or purchase orders will be accepted.  Once
 the first 300 TNCs have sold out, there will be NO WAITING LIST.
 These rules will not be bent.

 The TAPR PC board for the K9NG 9600-bit/s modem is also just
 about through beta testing.  Several of the boards in operation
 at beta sites.

     Ed.


 REPRODUCTION OF GATEWAY MATERIAL

 Material may be exerpted from Gateway without prior permission,
 provided that the original contributor is credited and Gateway is
 identified as the source.