[net.ham-radio] "PL"... - how FM noise squelches work

brian@sdcsvax.UUCP (Brian Kantor) (07/18/85)

In article <204@redwood.UUCP> rpw3@redwood.UUCP (Rob Warnock) writes:
>| > (Note to ham radio newcomers: the ``squelch tail'' is the burst of white
>
>Actually, with some fancy coupling between the squelch and AGC circuits,
>it should be possible to eliminate most or all of the "squelch tail".
>The squelch tail occurs because the AGC gain opens up faster than the
>squelch closes. By using a longer time-constant ...

It doesn't quite work that way....

In most FM receivers, there is little or no AGC (if any, its just used
to prevent overloading of early stages).  Instead, the signal is
amplified to levels that clip out all amplitude variations in the
signal.  Since the modulation on the signal being received is in 
the form of frequency deviations, the amplitude is irrelevent.  

It is precisely because most natural noise the intrudes
upon a transmitted signal is amplitude in nature that this clipping
process (called 'limiting') eliminates the noise background on FM
signals.  Since the modulation can still be recovered even after the
limiting has disposed of most of the amplitude variations, you have a
very quiet communications channel with little natural interference.  It
even gets rid of a lot of electron noise generated in the receiver
circuits.  The receiver hears a lot of this noise from random electrons
when there is no signal being received.  

The squelch circuit in most receivers works by measuring the amount of
high-frequency audio content in the received signal (typically, for a
300-3000 Hz communications channel, the squelch will sample at above 
16 KHz).  When this noise energy drops (when the receiver is quieted 
by a received signal), the squelch opens.  Some more sophisticated
receivers and in the received signal strength to prevent the squelch
from blowing if the receive loses gain for some reason (lower supply
voltage, for example, will reduce the gain and thus the noise, but won't
simulate a received signal).

All such noise squelches have a slight delay before opening to eliminate
popping cause by noise impulses that might momentarily quiet the receiver.

Some delay in closing the squelch is a good idea, as when a signal fades
quickly due to reinforcement and cancellation of multiple reflections
from the moving mobile transmitter or receiver (called ``chopping'' or
``popcorn'' depending upon its severity), the squelch should not close
as it cannot open quickly enough to avoid cutting off small parts of the
received audio.  But on a strong signal that is not choppy, there is no
need for a closing delay.

One of the first radios on the market with dual-rate noise squelch was
the Motorola MICOR, which had a moderate delay when the signal's average
quieting level was below some specific threshold, and was much faster
when the signal was strong.  The effect was that weak signals had a
squelch tail but did not chop off voices, and strong ones went away
without a noise burst.

Hope this clears up some of the confusion.

	Brian Kantor	WB6CYT	UC San Diego

	decvax\ 	brian@ucsd.arpa
	akgua  >---  sdcsvax  --- brian
	ucbvax/		Kantor@Nosc