[net.ham-radio] Loss of freedom

taylor.WBST@Xerox.ARPA (08/30/85)

YES, THIS MAY BE MORE IMPORTANT THEN THE OLD "RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS", REFRAIN!

		73

			JIM (W2OZH)

STEPHANY.WBST@Xerox.ARPA (08/30/85)

The reason for the loss of freedom to receive radio signals is due to
the fact that  lawyers, if paid enough, can have any  law or right
overturned for their clients.  It is cheaper to pay the lawyers and
change the law than it is to put encoders on the signal.  Note, the FCC
has gone on record as saying they will not licese receivers so all the
problems come under "theft of services".

But done worry.  Within 5 years all TV will be digitally encoded, then
coding to restrict tapping will be very cheap, and very hard to decode
and we can forget the "freedom" stuff.

				Joe N2XS
 

lauren@vortex.UUCP (Lauren Weinstein) (09/01/85)

"... Within 5 years all TV will be digitally encoded ..."

No way.  Not in 5 years.  Not in 10 years.

--Lauren--

STEPHANY.WBST@Xerox.ARPA (09/05/85)

re: "... Within 5 years all TV will be digitally encoded ..."

No way.  Not in 5 years.  Not in 10 years.
 
Explanation:  Sorry.  What was meant was that all satellite TV in the
feeder channels would be digital.  A conference 2 years ago standardize
the TV digital code for exchanging pictures between nations.  I agree
that local home TV will not be digitally encoded in the near future.  We
will go to the 1025 line system probably with 2.5/1 aspect ratio first.
Since Panasonic has a total digital TV set that can accept any TV
standard, 525,625 and 1025 line, and deliver a 1025 line picture, the
switch to, possibly, a totally digital TV on cable and satellite may be
very soon.  I agree that on-the-air local TV may be considerably delayed
in the switch.

			Joe N2XS

lauren@rand-unix.ARPA (09/06/85)

Sorry, I gotta disagree even with your clarified comment.

I see no evidence that the conventional cable satellite services
have any desire to convert to digital systems.  Perhaps a premium
service or two may play with high-resolution systems, but even
that is questionable in terms of economic viability.

Remember that once scrambling is in place and people are buying
descramblers, those millions of TVRO stations represent a significant
commercial market for the carriers and their advertisers/operations.
I don't expect to see digital TV transmission make signficant inroads
except possibly in international traffic, where the number of 
transmit/receive points is fairly small.  

Another issue is the extreme unwillingness of most cable systems
to make new capital purchases for their systems (say, for digital
TV equipment) unless it has immense immediate profit.

Digital TV may leak into the marketplace over time.  But given
the inertia and marketplace (and even political!) pressure of
the 10's of millions of people (and cable companies) with 
conventional equipment, I expect the process to be extremely
slow except in very specialized situations.  The time scale?
Maybe 10-15 years.  Maybe longer.

--Lauren--