[comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc] Bugs in BC++ 2.0 !!

rbaines@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Robert Baines) (03/31/91)

From article <1991Mar29.201947.10398@netcom.COM>, by resnicks@netcom.COM (Steve Resnick):
> 	One "bug" (feature?) I found in the conio stuff is with cgets.
> 	In TC Version 2.0 (Why the hell didn they name it Borland C++ 2.0)

As I understand it there are to be TWO C++ compilers, Borland C++ 2.0 and
Turbo C++ 2.0 (may not be out yet).  One is supposed to be a heavy duty
compiler to compete with Micrsoft C (Borland C++) and the other version is
the cheaper/limited version for those who don't need the professional version.
Also, I believe the Turbo version will NOT include Windows support.

If I got anything wrong somebody feel free to correct me. (politely of course)

elund@graphics.rent.com (Eric W. Lund - Subop) (04/02/91)

> As I understand it there are to be TWO C++ compilers, Borland C++ 2.0
> and Turbo C++ 2.0 (may not be out yet).  One is supposed to be a heavy
> duty compiler to compete with Micrsoft C (Borland C++) and the other
> version is the cheaper/limited version for those who don't need the
> professional version. Also, I believe the Turbo version will NOT include
> Windows support.

Sounds like Lotus-envy to me.  <hurumph>