[net.ham-radio] FRG9600 / ANTS / AND CELULAR PHONES

biro@pipa.DEC (11/25/85)

I like to comment on the following:

1) Broadband Antennas for 60-900MHz
2) FRG-9600 performance
3) Cellular Telephone is easy 


1) Broadband Antennas for 60-900MHz
> I am considering the purchase of a Yaesu FRG-9600 and would like to hear
> others thoughts on Broadband antennas for the 60-900MHz.....

I have a FRG-9600 and one of the antennas I use is a inexpensive dis-cone,
they range form $20 to $70 or so. It does cover the  entire band,  but as  
you go higher in freq the antenna pattern bends lower towards the horizon.  
If you want to use it for terrestrial communication you will be find, but 
if you want to monitor aircraft in the  UHF area it will be poor.  I find 
that my two meter beam at 50 ft. does a good job as an all band ant.   It 
is so  poorly design it  receives in  all directions so it works  for the 
aircraft in the UHF bands.(also not to shabby for the cellular tele. band.)

2) FRG-9600 performance

I have a FRG-9600 and I like it, it is a good communication receiver  but 
a poor scanner, but with a simple computer interface  and program you can 
easily overcome this problem.  Its major electrical problem is   blockage 
form nearby strong stations. I think that the R7000 will be a better unit, 
but it may have some of the bad features of the R71A, such  as only being 
able to stop on a signal or stay on it for 5 sec. I  really like stopping 
on a signal until the squelch has dropped for some time period. 

3) Cellular Telephone is easy to track

There seem  to the  idea that  Cellular Telephone  reception is difficult, 
expensive, and of a very short range without expensive equipment. This is 
not so, with my FRG-9600 using a two meter beam at 50 ft.  I can  receive 
Celular  signals  in about a 20 mile radius.  I  can  easily  follow  the 
conversation as it switches by one of two different techniques.

First the harder way but most always works.
1) Make a  list of all the station you can receive, it is not to bad
   now as there are not many station, in my area I can receive about
   30 units. Then scan these 30 until you find your station again -
   this is not as bad as  it  sounds  as  I  find the station do not 
   change that fast, maybe one change in two min. There design range
   is about 8 miles and at 60 mile_per_hour it could be in range for
   8 min.
or
2) If you  just  want the units in your local area, try setting  the
   radio to WBMF and  scan  in  100KHz steps, local cell will be the
   only one that will stay in FM capture, and you can easily let the 
   radio follow the cell this way.  This works best when the band is 
   not too crowded say less then 10 or so active cells,  by  plotting
   the person direction one can find the general location of the cells
   or visa versa.

I have not spent much time doing this as it is not what I like to do
in SWLing, but I do think people who have Cellular phone think they
are secure and understand why the FEDs would like to monitor these
as easily as the HF phones.

73's good SWLing
John