hooverm@sysjj.mdcbbs.com (SQUID 6 on the DARK side) (12/06/90)
Summary of opinions re: Plus Development's HardCards Here is a summary of opinions I received regarding the HARDCARD from Plus Development. Based upon these opinions, a HARDCARD is definitely in my future! Mark <o===6 ==================================== From: BBS::IN%"uunet!clutx.clarkson.edu!smithbm" "Azrak" 3-DEC-1990 20:50:20.74 I have the HardCard40 (the old one designed for the PC). During the time it was in an IBM PC (yea, the original!) it worked flawlessly. It came with no bad sectors marked or unmarked. It was a perfect disk. I think after the second year of operation, the drive wouldn't start spinning upon bootup. After a call to Plus's technical support, they had a few reasons why it might not run. One reason was that the drive might have been oiled too much. (I took the drive out, waved it in the air a couple times, and reseated it into the slot and it booted up fine, though it did continue sticking) After all the data was backed up, Plus gave us a brand new drive and took the old one back to see what went wrong. They gave us the new drive with no questions asked. I have the replacement unit in a Zenith 248 (80286-8), a school issued computer (Don't ever buy Zenith!!) I cannot boot off the drive because the Zenith complains about an "unformatted partition". It is quite formatted (about 10 times during my frenzy to get the Zenith to boot off it), so I can't figure out what the trouble is. It is NOT the HardCard's fault. The manual says the HardCard will work fine on 80286 based machines. I think it is the Zenith. I highly recommend the HardCard. Keep in mind, I have an old drive. The replacement unit has worked perfectly since I got it. I boot off of drive A, but that is because of the Zenith. I run the computer every day (more than a year now) and the drive hasn't stuck once. Also, neither drives had ANY bad sectors. Marked or unmarked; old or new. It is an 8-bit card, 175K/Sec transfer rate (Due to slow 80286, 8-bit, old technology, and Zenith DOS), and less than 40ms access time. Yes, very slow, but for free from Dad, I'm not complaining. The new HardCards are MUCH better. The new HardCardII40 and 80 are nice drives. Now Plus has the HardCardIIXL in 50Mb or 105(!)Mb sizes. I think they are still only an inch thick. The XL series has 9ms access time with the cache installed. Sorry if I rambled on too much. I hope this helps you on your decision. - Brian Smith (smithbm@clutx.clarkson.edu) ==================================== From: BBS::IN%"att!attmail.ATT.COM!rabeck" 4-DEC-1990 07:32:25.45 I just installed a 80MB HardcardII on an AT&T 386 with no trouble. I haven't really had much opportunity to use it yet, but there was no trouble with the installation. Is there any particular information I can try to find out for you? Ron Beck ==================================== From: BBS::IN%"uunet!engr.uark.edu!mdk" 4-DEC-1990 08:51:33.09 I saw your note about the hardcard.. I've got the 80 meg version in my home computer. This is the 2nd hardcard I have purchased from Plus Development . I am very impressed with the company and their products. I sold my 4 year old Plus Hardcard 20 and bought the 80 Meg version. The only problem I had with the hardcard is that the original driver (.SYS) wasn't compatable with windows v3.0. I called them, and they Federal Expressed a new version to me the next day.. Let me know if I can answer any questions for you.. Mike Kohut mdk@engr.uark.edu ==================================== From: BBS::IN%"uunet!sumax.seattleu.edu!halcyon!ralphs" 5-DEC-1990 12:52:53.73 This is one of the best mass storage devices available. I have used their 20 meg products for years, and if I were able to afford the 105meg drive (or even the 80), I would get one without hesitation. PLUS has a very fine reputation. These drives are quiet, accurate, dependable (I've installed a dozen of them and they are so reliable, I can't remember where), etc., etc., etc. With the 9ms access time, the larger ones should be blazingly fast. I think the 20's were around 40ms, maybe 28--it's been a while. Do not attempt to change interleaves, etc. after the drive is installed. PLUS uses a proprietary RLL system that I could not overcome with standard hard drive formatting utilities. They have their own software to do that kind of thing. ==================================== From: BBS::IN%"uunet!actew.oz.au!ins_wayne" "Wayne Myles" 5-DEC-1990 16:55:12.31 I have owned one of these exact drives for over a year now, and it has performed brilliantly at all times - within specification. Unfortunately, it has a non-standard BIOS, so it will work only with device drivers; these are supplied for DOS and OS/2 only. In both environments, it works like a charm. In others, they don't want to know. MINIX will not boot, because it uses an IRQ over 16 (decimal). MS Windows 3 has a hernia, as usual with any non-standard BIOS driver, however close. (I detest and loath microsoft.) For normal DOS stuff, it's hard to beat. The performance is great. I have seen a PLUS HardCard removed from a machine, repeatedly bashed hard on a table, plugged in, and work perfectly. Amazing! Wayne Myles Email: ins_wayne@actew.oz.au, wsm@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au