[net.ham-radio] ARRL LETTER vol. 4, #26

wheatley@inuxi.UUCP (Steven Wheatley) (01/05/86)

  
                           /\  
                          /  \ 
                         / A  \ 
                        /      \   
        ===============/        \============== 
              THE     / R      R \   LETTER 
            VOLUME 4  \          /  NUMBER 26 
        ===============\        /============== 
                        \      / 
                         \ L  / 
                          \  /   
                           \/ 
                                           
                  December 19, 1985 
 
    The ARRL Letter is published bi-weekly by the Information 
Services Department of the American Radio Relay League, 225 Main 
St., Newington, CT, 06111; (203) 666-1541.  Larry E. Price, W4RA, 
President; David Sumner, K1ZZ, Executive Vice President; Dave 
Newkirk, AK7M, Editor; Debra Chapor, Circulation Manager.

    Information from The ARRL Letter may be reproduced in whole 
or part in any form including photoreproduction and electronic 
databanks, providing credit is given to  The ARRL Letter and to 
the American Radio Relay League. 
 
The ARRL Letter is available in  printed  form  from ARRL.  
Subscriptions, limited to ARRL Members, are $19.50 (U.S. funds)  
per year  for First-Class Mailing to the U.S.,  Canada, and 
Mexico.  Overseas air  mail subscriptions  are available at $31 
(U.S.  funds)  per year.   Sample copies  are available for an 
s.a.s.e. 
                              
 
In this issue: 
 
o PRIVACY ACT DOES NOT TARGET PHONE PATCHES
 
o LEAGUE OPPOSES LOW-POWER 902 MHz VIDEO LINKS
 
o NEW THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT WITH 4U1VIC        
 
o ...and much more! 
 

PRIVACY ACT DOES NOT TARGET PHONE PATCHES
    We first mentioned the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 
of 1985 in the November 7 Letter.  Here's more.  This League 
Lines item is preprinted from January 1986 QST and is copyright 
(C) 1985 by the American Radio Relay League, Inc:

In communications to ARRL and to their representatives in 
Congress, amateurs are running up verbal "hurricane warning" 
flags regarding the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 
1985, S. 1667 and H.R. 3378.  "Small craft warnings" would be far 
more appropriate: The bill indeed requires some attention from 
the amateur community, but it poses far less threat to amateurs 
than some people think.  More next month, but for now be assured 
that: (1) the bill does not propose to outlaw phone patches; (2) 
it would not make possession (by anyone) of any kind of equipment 
illegal; (3) the bill can't possibly reach the House (or the 
Senate) for a vote before February or later; and (4) ARRL is 
working closely and personally with Committee staff to smooth out 
rough spots.

    ARRL had been asked to testify at a December 5 hearing 
scheduled by the House Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties 
and the Administration of Justice on the Electronic 
Communications Privacy Act of 1985, but that hearing will 
probably be rescheduled to January 29 or 30 of next year.  
Whenever, ARRL will be there.  Why was the hearing rescheduled?  
It was preempted by the Chairman of the full Judiciary Committee, 
Peter W. Rodino, Jr, D-New Jersey.  The Judiciary Committee had 
received a 1400-page report on doings at the Environmental 
Protection Agency, and on a procedural point it was insisted that 
the entire report be read!  Wrote ARRL's Washington Area 
Coordinator:                 

"Part way through the reading, after an hour or so, however, a 
compromise was struck, waiving  the reading . . . so some useful 
purpose could be accomplished by the hearing.  None of this is 
germane to our work; I mention it because I was fascinated, and 
also to show that the cancellation of the hearing on the Privacy 
Act was not part of solows:

(cc) Spread spectrum transmission.  An information bearing 
transmission in which information is conveyed by a modulated RF 
carrier and where the bandwidth is significantly widened, by 
means of a spreading  function,  over  that  needed  totransmit 
the information alone.

    Add a new Section 97.71, Spread spectrum communications, as 
follows:

  (a)  Subject to special conditions in paragraphs (b) through 
(i) of this section, amateurlows:

(cc) Spread spectrum transmission.  An information bearing 
transmission in which information is conveyed by a modulated RF 
carrier and where the bandwidth is significantly widened, by 
means of a spreading  function,  over  that  needed  totransmit 
the information alone.

    Add a new Section 97.71, Spread spectrum communications, as 
follows:

  (a)  Subject to special conditions in paragraphs (b) through 
(i) of this section, amateur stations may employ spread spectrum 
transmissions to convey information containing voice, 
teleprinter, facsimile, television, signals for  remote control 
of objects, computer programs, data, and other communications 
including communication protocol elements.  Spread spectrum 
transmissions  must  not  be  used  for  the purpose of obscuring 
the meaning of, but only to facilitate transmission.

  (b)  Spread spectrum transmissions are authorized on amateur 
frequencies above 420 MHz.

  (c)  Stations employing spread-spectrum transmissions shall not 
cause harmful interference to stations of good engineering design 
employing other authorized emissions specified in the table.  
Stations employing spread spectrum must also accept all 
interference caused by stations of good engineering design 
employing other authorized emissions specified in the table.  
(For the purposes of this subparagraph, unintended triggering of 
carrier operated repeaters is not considered to be harmful 
interference.  Nevertheless, spread spectrum users should take 
reasonable steps to avoid this situation from occurring.)

  (d)  Spread spectrum transmissions are authorized for domestic 
radio communication only (communication between points within 
areas where radio services are regulated by the U.S. Federal 
Communications Commission), except where special arrangements 
have been made between the United States and the administration 
of any other country concerned.

  (e)  Only frequency hopping and direct sequence transmissions 
are authorized.  Hybrid spread-spectrum transmissions 
(transmissions involving both spreading techniques) are 
prohibited.

  (1)  Frequency hopping.  The carrier is modulated with 
unciphered information and changes at fixed intervals under the 
direction of a high speed code sequence.

  (2)  Direct sequence.  The information is modulo-2 added to a 
high-speed code sequence.  The combined information and code are 
then used to modulate a RF carrier.  The high speed code sequence 
dominates the modulating function, and is the direct cause of the 
wide spreading of the transmitted signal.

  (f)  The only spreading sequences which are authorized must be 
from the output of one binary linear feedback shift register 
(which may be implemented in hardware or software).

  (1)  Only the following sets of connections may be used:

     Number of stages     Taps used in
     in shift register      feedback 

             7             [7,1]
             13            [13,4,3,1]
             19            [19,5,2,1]

(The numbers in brackets indicate which binary stages are 
combined with modulo-2 addition to form the input to the shift 
register in stage 1.  The output is taken from the highest 
numbered stage.)

  (2)  The shift register must not be reset other than by its 
feedback during an individual transmission.  The shift register 
must be used as follows.

   (i)  For frequency hopping transmissions using x frequencies, 
n consecutive bits from the shift register must be used to select 
the next frequency from a list of frequencies sorted in ascending 
order.  Each consecutive frequency must be selected by a 
consecutive block of n bits. (Where n is the smallest integer 
greater than log2 x.)

   (ii)  For a direct sequence transmissions using m-ary 
modulation, consecutive blocks of log2 m bits from the shift 
register must be used to select the transmitted signal during 
each interval.

  (g)  The station records shall document all spread spectrum 
transmissions and shall be retained for a period of one year 
following the last entry.  The station records must include 
sufficient information to enable the Commission, using the 
information contained therein, to demodulate all transmissions.  
The station records must contain at least the following:

  (1)  A technical description of the transmitted signal.

  (2)  Pertinent parameters describing the transmitted signal 
including the frequency or frequencies of operation, and, where 
applicable, the chip rate, the code, the code rate, the spreading 
function, the transmission protocol(s) including the method of 
achieving synchronization, and the modulation type;

  (3)  A general description of the type of information being 
conveyed, for example, voice, text, memory dump, facsimile, 
television, etc.;

  (4)  The method and, if applicable, the frequency or 
frequencies used for station identification.

  (5)  The date of beginning and the date of ending use of each 
type of transmitted signal.

  (h)  When deemed necessary by an Engineer-in-Charge of a 
Commission field facility to assure compliance with the rules of 
this part, a station licensee shall:

  (1)  Cease spread spectrum transmissions authorized under this 
paragraph;
 
  (2) Restrict spread spectrum transmissions authorized under 
this paragraph to the extent instructed;

  (3)  Maabove; narrow band identification transmissions must be 
on only one frequency in each band being used.  Alternatively, 
the station identification may be transmitted while in spread 
spectrum operation by changing one or more parameters of the 
emission in a fashion such that CW or SSB or narrow band FM 
receivers can be used to identify the sending station.

NEW THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT WITH 4U1VIC
    United Nations Vienna and the US government have concluded a 
thirdabove; narrow band identification transmissions must be on 
only one frequency in each band being used.  Alternatively, the 
station identification may be transmitted while in spread 
spectrum operation by changing one or more parameters of the 
emission in a fashion such that CW or SSB or narrow band FM 
receivers can be used to identify the sending station.

NEW THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT WITH 4U1VIC
    United Nations Vienna and the US government have concluded a 
third-party traffic agreement, effective January 2, 1986.  The 
call sign at the Vienna International Centre is 4U1VIC, operated 
by the Vienna International Amateur Radio Club.
The usual third-party-traffic guidelines in Section 97.114 of our 
Rules apply.

JOB OPENING AT ARRL HQ
    ARRL HQ is looking to fill a vacancy in the Regulatory 
Information Branch Manager position.  Primary responsibilities 
include editing The ARRL Letter and writing the Happenings and 
League Lines columns for QST, as well as updating The FCC Rule 
Book.  The RIB Manager also answers phone and letter inquiries on 
a wide variety of regulatory matters, including antenna 
ordinances and FCC rules interpretations.
    Applicants must have a General Class or higher amateur 
license; good writing ability and experience are required.  A 
broad background in Amateur Radio and some supervisory experience 
would be helpful.  Annual salary range $18,226-$25,506.  If you 
feel you're qualified for this position, call Bob Halprin or John 
Lindholm at 203-666-1541.

LEAGUE OPPOSES LOW-POWER 902-MHz VIDEO LINKS
    In the November 7 Letter we covered a petition by Jerry 
Iggulden of Valencia, California, requesting that FCC allow 
unlicensed operation of low-power video transmitters at 902-928 
MHz.  The idea behind the petition (RM-5193) is the operation of 
such transmitters to link video sources, such as VCRs, to 
television sets without the bother of interconnecting wires.  
Unlicensed low-power communication devices operate at quite a few 
places in the radio spectrum, it's true -- but this proposal 
would plunk strong video sources smack dab in our new 902-MHz 
band!
    "Ungood," is ARRL's response.  "The consumer would be ill-
served by the proposal.  The largest potential market for such 
consumer devices would be for use in single- or multiple-family 
dwellings in or near major metropolitan areas.  The highest 
concentration of Amateur Radio stations also can be found in 
single- or multiple-family dwellings in or near major 
metropolitan areas."  Such unlicensed devices must not interfere 
with any licensed services on any frequency -- and the projected 
902-MHz devices would provide quite a  front-end-full:  
"Calculations by the League's Technical Staff indicate that a 
radiated signal of the permitted intensity (50,000 microvolts-
per-meter at 30 meters) would produce a voltage of over 540 
microvolts at the receiver input of a good amateur station at a 
distance of 1 kilometer . . . at 10 kilometers, the predicted 
signal would be 54 uV/m.  The amateur receiving such interference 
at ranges of over 10 kilometers would face the problem of 
indentifying one or multiple interference sources; calling on all 
neighbors within that range to determine which one(s) had 
installed such a video transmitter (a continuous-duty-cycle 
device when operated); and the difficult or impossible chore of 
convincing the consumer that the device should not be operated."
    "Neither the Commission nor the manufacturers of garage-door 
openers should have forgotten the problems which arose when those 
devices were operated on frequencies adjacent to voice 
frequencies in the Citizens Radio Service and on frequencies 
assigned to the Aviation Radio Service . . . it would appear . . 
. that Part 15 Rules  as presently stated sufficiently provide 
for the type of device proposed by Petitioner (on frequencies 
other than those assigned to the Amateur Radio Service), provided 
that all technical rules are observed."  
    ARRL's Comments in Opposition to Petition for Rule Making in 
RM-5193 end there, but we'll add something you already know: say 
such devices were allowed, did sprout all over the 902-928 MHz 
band in metro areas (although with the projected signal levels  
at 10km and beyond, rural amateurs would be hit with this, too) 
-- who would be blamed when your licensed amateur signal messed 
up someone's unlicensed video link, the video link that's 
supposed to accept harmful interference and not cause any?  The 
answer's in your mirror: you.

CQ HOLIDAYS DE W1AW
    Over the weekend of December 28 and 29, ARRL HQ staffers will 
put W1AW on the air on all HF bands for general contacts.  The 
regularly scheduled biweekly transmission of Keplerian data at 
2330 UTC on Saturday will be sent, but other scheduled 
transmissions may be preempted as activity warrants.  Operation 
will begin at approximately 1300 UTC each day.  All QSLs received 
for this operation will be answered with the distinctive W1AW 
QSL, including a commemorative "350 Years of Connecticut" 
sticker.
REACTION TO CANADIAN RESTRUCTURING
    Last Letter's lead covered the Department of Communications' 
proposal for restructuring Amateur Radio in Canada.  Initial 
reaction seems mostly favorable.  There is strong feeling that 
the examination for the entry level Certificate A be substantial, 
and that DOC should offer a "Slow Code" certificate that, in 
conjunction with Certificate A, would give CW privileges on the 
HF bands.

CLOSE, BUT NO CIGAR
    We correct two glitches in the last Letter:
    In "Ad Hoc Committee on Spread-Spectrum Interoperability," 
page 3, the callsign of committee member Dick Bingham is W7WKR.     
Re the US/Korea holiday traffic (page 4), the traffic is limited 
to amateur stations in the Republic of Korea with the prefix HL9.  
Once again, this temporary third-party agreement is in effect for 
the period 0001 UTC December 20, 1985, to 2359 UTC January 4, 
1986.

AND, AT YEAR'S END,
    Speaking of holiday traffic: peace and enjoyment for the 
holiday season are wished you by the entire HQ staff.