[comp.os.msdos.apps] Windows USELESS with MSDOS 5.0!!!

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/14/91)

Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

Robert_Salesas@mindlink.bc.ca (Robert Salesas) (06/14/91)

The installation process (or the manual) says that under some systems and some
circumstance, DOS 5.0 will re-assign drive letters around.  If this is the
case, then obviously your program manager groups won't work.

Try this.  Click on an icon of a DOS program _once_, then select "properties"
from the menu.  Check the path that is written in the edit box.  Now use the
"browse" button to see if the application is where the previous line says it
is.  If it isn't then that's your problem.  Just reassign all the icons.

Rob
--
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/
\ Robert Salesas             + Usenet: Robert_Salesas@MINDLINK.bc.ca /
\ Eschalon Development Inc.  + CIS:    76625,1320    BYTE:  newdawn  /
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

mstr@vipunen.hut.fi (Markus Strand) (06/14/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!


That's not true, you must have some other problem. I have had no
problems with DOS 5 and Win3 or any other program. 


Markus Strand

jhorigan@cook.berkeley.edu (John W. Horigan) (06/14/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>-- 
>David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
>EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

Did you repartition the hard drive during installation?  When I
did I saved about 10meg in wasted space but I had to change all
D: references to C: in all the .INI files and in Program
Manager's group files (the latter done tediously, one icon at a
time. Maybe those Mac guys are right.)  When you make these changes
you'll also have to rebind the icons to your non-Windows programs. 
Microsoft should provide a way of invisibly binding icons to 
non-Windows files.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Horigan     jhorigan@cook.berkeley.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------

oneel@heawk1.gsfc.nasa.gov ( Bruce Oneel ) (06/14/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:

   Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
   find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
   program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
   about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
   these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
   didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
   -- 
   David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
   EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

Well, something went wrong.  Do you mean that windows can't find non
MS windows programs  that you've installed as icons in the program
manager?  I don't have that problem.  TPW worked fine before and after
the 5.0 upgrade.  So does everything else I tried.  Maybe you could
describe your symptoms more?

bruce
--
Bruce O'Neel              oneel@heasfs.gsfc.nasa.gov
NASA/GSFC/STX/Code 664

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/14/91)

I didn't repartition the drive, but I did add a scsi controller with
one disk and I also, now that you ask, deleted the last partition on
the first disk because that partition was so small. Note that win works
well under dos 3.3. There is some problem with dos5 that screws up win
3.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

timr@gssc.UUCP (Tim Roberts) (06/14/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

Sit down, take a deep breath, and be more specific.  Windows works just fine
under DOS 5.0 for everyone in our building who has tried it, with one 
exception: the DOS 5.0 EMM386 prevents Standard mode.  However, all my icons 
came up just fine after the upgrade.

What are the symptoms?  Did the icons disappear, or do the old icons just not
work any more?  Did you run out of disk space?  Are you talking about
non-Windows apps?  If so, are you using a PIF and could your COMMAND.COM have
moved to a different directory?

-- 
timr@gssc.gss.com	Tim N Roberts, CCP	Graphic Software Systems
						Beaverton, OR

This is a very long palindrome. .emordnilap gnol yrev a si sihT

lev@slced1.nswses.navy.mil (Lloyd E Vancil) (06/14/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>-- 
>David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
>EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

Yesterday we had a MS traveling road show here.  The lady had a compaq
slt386 running win3 and dos 5.0 it all worked good for her even if she
did not know the difference between extended/expanded ram....
I asked her about the conflicts between MSDOS and the older Pheonix
BIOS.  She said she had "heard they got around it."     |-[   Bah!

    IF YOU ARE RUNNING A 286 WITH AN OLDER VERSION OF THE PHEONIX BIOS
    YOU CAN HAVE ALL SORTS OF WIERD PROBLEMS.
	ex.   WIN.INI disappears (goes to 0 bytes) after editing it with
 	      SYSEDIT.   ANY attempt to recreate it, windows copy, dos copy,
	      rename, and copy all report successful but destination is 0
	      bytes.
    	 	THIS WAS CONFLICT WITH PHEONIX AND COMPAQ's MSDOS 3.31
		ON RETURNING TO DOS 3.3.0 THE PROBLEMS WENT AWAY.
    During my fight with this BS, I managed to get through to MS tech support
    The tech there had seen my problem before -- I must'a been lucky ;-) --
    recommended that I go back to 3.3.0 and warned me that I might have 
    probelms with "future versions of MSDOS" --This was 4 days prior
    to the 5.0 announcement...........  
--
 | suned1!lev@elroy.JPL.Nasa.Gov | * S.T.A.R.S.!   .       +      o       |
 | lev@suned1.nswses.navy.mil    | The Revolution has begun!   .     +    |
 | sun!suntzu!suned1!lev         | My Opinions are Mine mine mine hahahah!|

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/15/91)

My problem is that if I boot msdos 5.0 (from floppy) none of the
non-windows programs in my program manager window will start (system
says they can't be found). If I boot pcdos 3.3 (from floppy)
everything works as expected.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

nyet@nntp-server.caltech.edu (n liu) (06/15/91)

lev@slced1.nswses.navy.mil (Lloyd E Vancil) writes:

>In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

Hrm. I've seen something similar happen on my friends 486 with dos4.01.
Essentially, we made sure the "Properties" pointed to the proper .pif,
.exe, or .com, and then double clicked on the icon. Bam. Can't find the
dos app error. He since fixed it, but i forgot how. The point being that
it was not dos5.0 and you should look to other solutions. Personally,
i've had NO problems with dos5.0 (beta) except for having to run setver
for random games.
.
nye

gillham@andrews.edu (Andrew Gillham) (06/16/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>-- 
>David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
>EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

What about your configuration?  (how do you have it setup?)

Have you tried setting the version down to 3.3?

-Andrew
--
=====================================================================
Andrew Gillham ****** Andrews University ****** (gillham@andrews.edu)
I would've added a cool .signature, but I already mailed this letter.

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/16/91)

I tried setting the version of win.com to 3.3, but that had no effect.
I also tried rebooting with a dos 3.3 floppy and windows worked
properly, finding and executing the programs invoked.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

Robert_Salesas@mindlink.bc.ca (Robert Salesas) (06/16/91)

Are the programs you're trying to strat on a network or on your local drives?

If they're on a network, you might want to contact LANTASTIC and see if they
have an upgrade to the software.

Rob
--
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/
\ Robert Salesas             + Usenet: Robert_Salesas@MINDLINK.bc.ca /
\ Eschalon Development Inc.  + CIS:    76625,1320    BYTE:  newdawn  /
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

lro@melb.bull.oz.au (Liam Routt) (06/17/91)

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>-- 
>David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
>EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

No.
Microsoft conducted one of the largest beta tests ever for MS-DOS 5.0 -
around 7000 sites world-wide for around 18 months.  I am _sure_ that they
tested it with Windows, as they talked about it at the Developer's Forum
here in Melbourne Australia just prior to the release.
	I do not know the solution to your particular problem, as I have
not actually used DOS 5.0 yet, but I am sure that there is one, and they
know what they are talking about.

						Liam Routt
	"Murder by Pirates is Good!"		Senior Software Engineer
		- The Princess Bride		Bull Information Sytems
						Melbourne Australia
PS I was not a beta tester for Microsoft!

rxcob@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au (Owen Baker) (06/17/91)

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:

>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

What a stupid comment to make! As Ive seen nobody else complain about this
and I have had no problems with DOS 5.00 and Windows 3, I suggest you start
by reading the manuals (if you have them??). Apologies if this is a bit
harsh but I object to articles that attempt to grab your attention with
this sort of subject matter.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Owen Baker                                                                 |
| odb@bodoni.csu.rmit.oz.au                      RMIT Novell - BODONI/ODB    |
| CSU, RMIT, Melbourne, Vic. Australia.          Telephone (61) (3) 660-2038 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) (06/17/91)

DOS 5.0 advertises that it is particularly useful with Windows 3.0.
I've had no problem with the combination.  I've tried both the windows
and non-windows versions of kermit, and a couple of other DOS
applications, but certainly have not made an exhaustive test.  The
only thing I found different between DOS 3.2 and 5.0 was that suddenly
the setup I was using for QEMM386 (the memory manager supplied with
Desqview 386) causes Windows 3.0 to bomb.  For some reason (lost in
the dim reaches of history) I was invoking qemm with the arguments
"ram rom ext=1500".  Removing the ext=1500 makes Windows 3.0 work
correctly.  Running the version of himem.sys that came with windows
3.0 before qemm also made the problem go away (but not the version of
himem.sys that came with DOS 5.0), though that's not a very good
approach.  I had no problems with Windows 3.0 when using the software
recommended by Microsoft, which is the himem.sys and emm386.exe that
came with DOS 5.0.

jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris) (06/17/91)

In a recent posting feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

I've been watching this thread and just realized that I've seen the
symptoms while trying to track down a nasty interaction between Windows
and (non-Windows) comm programs running in a DOS window.  You'll get 
the symptoms you described ("unable to find program" or whatever the
error message text is) if you run out of file handles.  (I saw it
because Windows shattered and returned to DOS without closing files.)

Check the files=nnn line in CONFIG.SYS to make sure you've got a minimum
of 30 (per the Windows manual) plus whatever your other programs are
using.

Joe Morris

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/17/91)

mstr@vipunen.hut.fi (Markus Strand) writes:

>In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!


>That's not true, you must have some other problem. I have had no
>problems with DOS 5 and Win3 or any other program. 

Which of the above statements that I wrote is not true?
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/17/91)

Since I made the original posting, I've discovered two more details:1)
I cannot even start a program from the file manager by clicking on an
exe-type file (same error message - can't find program).
Lantastic doesn't start up properly NET ATTACH/VERBOSE command fails
to attach and reports no error.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/17/91)

You're Welcome.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/18/91)

Thanks. You may have just won a prize. Stay tuned.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) (06/18/91)

Morris has correctly diagnosed the problem I was having. The dos
installation program set the FILES parameter =10. Windows needs more.
Setting FILES=50 cured my system of its windows problems.

Thanks to all who were trying to help me figure this out.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (06/18/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

Check your paths. On my machine for example, where DOS 3.30 put my third floppy
drive as drive "C:", DOS 5.0 places it after all hard disk partitions (In this
case, as drive "E:"). This caused all my HD partitions to move up by one. My
promary boot partition used to be "D:" under 3.30, and is now "C:" under 5.0,
so I have to go to the "properties" selection under the "File" menu in the
program manager to fix all the paths.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254

smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) (06/18/91)

jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris) writes:
>
>You'll get 
>the symptoms you described ("unable to find program" or whatever the
>error message text is) if you run out of file handles.  (I saw it
>because Windows shattered and returned to DOS without closing files.)
>
>Check the files=nnn line in CONFIG.SYS to make sure you've got a minimum
>of 30 (per the Windows manual) plus whatever your other programs are
>using.

Brilliant!  I should have thought of that too, because 2 weeks ago
I was running Windows in standard mode under Desqview and once Windows
was up and running Desqview could no longer open any more windows
because it said it couldn't find the application's configuration
file.

I changed my files from 20 to 25 and that took care of the problem.

Try it, you'll like it.

Stephen M. Smith  \  +  /
<smsmith@hpuxa.   \+++++/    " #*&<-[89s]*(k#$@-_=//a2$]'+=.(2_&*%>,,@
 ircc.ohio-state. \  +  /      {7%*@,..":27g)-=,#*:.#,/6&1*.4-,l@#9:-)  "
 edu>             \  +  / 
 BTW, WYSInaWYG   \  +  /                              --witty.saying.ARC

mstr@vipunen.hut.fi (Markus Strand) (06/18/91)

In article <1991Jun17.141032.1580@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>mstr@vipunen.hut.fi (Markus Strand) writes:
>
>>In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>>>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>>>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>>>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>>>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>>>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>>>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>
>
>>That's not true, you must have some other problem. I have had no
>>problems with DOS 5 and Win3 or any other program. 
>
>Which of the above statements that I wrote is not true?
>-- 
>David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
>EMAIL: feustel@netcom.com  or feustel@cvax.ipfw.indiana.edu


The " Subject: Windows USELESS with MSDOS 5.0!!! " is not true.... :)


Markus

bxw@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au (Brad Willcott) (06/18/91)

feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:

>Since I made the original posting, I've discovered two more details:1)
>I cannot even start a program from the file manager by clicking on an
>exe-type file (same error message - can't find program).
>Lantastic doesn't start up properly NET ATTACH/VERBOSE command fails
>to attach and reports no error.

Well David, I think that it is about time you explained yourself a bit better.
I've been using a beta test version of MS-DOS 5.00 and WIN3 on a 286 640K
system for about three months and have had NO problems.  In fact, I've noticed
a performance improvement in WIN3.  After the installation of 5.00, I backed
everything up onto tape, and repartitioned/reformated the hard drive.

-	What is your hardware/network environment?  
-	Are the 'missing' programs on your local hard disk or on a network 
	drive?  
-	WHY are you booting from a floppy diskette anyway???

If you are serious about solving this problem, then e-mail me and lets end
this thread before it gets out of hand!

-- 
Brad Willcott,                          ACSnet:     bxw@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz
Computing Services,                     Internet:   bxw@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au
Australian Defence Force Academy,       UUCP:!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ccadfa.oz!bxw
Northcott Dr. Campbell ACT Australia 2600  +61 6 268 8584  +61 6 268 8150 (Fax)

wmah@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Wayne Mah) (06/25/91)

laughner@darwin.cc.nd.edu (Tom Laughner) writes:

> Windows MSDOS 5.0
> 
> In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feus
> >Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
> >find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
> >program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
> >about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
> >these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
> >didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
> >-- 
> I've been using DOS 5.0 with Windows 3.0 along with DOS apps and 
> 
> **having views on these things, anyway.
> 
> 
> :Jim Mann                                      jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.co
> :Stratus Computer
> :
> :   Not since Cromwell's troops, their puritan sensibilities offended by beau
> :   went around smashing decorative art in churches has there been an act 
> :   of folly  comparable  to the abandonment and destruction of Forbes Field,
> :   the Pirates' home for generations.   
> :                --  George F. Will, from Men at Work: The Craft of Baseball
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Dan S.
> 
> 
>   Faith Brown (comedienne), Nicholas Courtney, Bob

Some of the older programs may not recognize DOS 5.0 and refuse
to run because when they execute they could be checking for the
DOS version.  Try putting device=c:\dos\setver.exe in your
config.sys and see if that works any better.  I just installed
my copy of DOS 5.0 two days ago and haven
't run into any problems yet with it.  Of course, that doesn't
help you, but at least you know it can be done.

Wayne Mah              wmah@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca
Edmonton Remote Systems:  Serving Northern Alberta since 1982

jesse@gumby.Altos.COM (Jesse Chisholm AAC-RjesseD) (06/26/91)

In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!

I, also, am using MS-DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0.  To run a DOS app, create
a PIF file for it and then use it.  There should be no problem.
If the application does some strange things with memory, then Windows
may kill it off, but most run just fine.

-- 
|| Jesse Chisholm                | 137 East Fremont Avenue, #49 ||
|| jesse@Altos86.Altos.COM       | Sunnyvale, California        ||
|| jesse@Gumby.Altos.COM         | U.S.A.  94087-2501           ||
|| Tel INT + 1-408-432-6200x4810 | Fax INT + 1-408-434-0273     ||

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (06/27/91)

In article <4956@gumby.Altos.COM> jesse@gumby.Altos.COM (Jesse Chisholm AAC-RjesseD) writes:
>In article <1991Jun13.235553.24042@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>>Now that I've got your attention, the problem is that Windows cannot
>>find any of my non MS programs when I attempt to invoke them via the
>>program manager. I've spent some time trying to get hold of MS to ask
>>about this, but I can't get through and the $$$ are adding up.  All of
>>these programs start properly under PCDOS 3.3. Is it possible that MS
>>didn't test dos 5.0 with windows?!!!
>
>I, also, am using MS-DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0.  To run a DOS app, create
>a PIF file for it and then use it.  There should be no problem.
>If the application does some strange things with memory, then Windows
>may kill it off, but most run just fine.
>

Make sure that you have enough "FILES" specified in you config.sys. 30 should
do.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254