[net.ham-radio] ARRL LETTER V5, NO 1

wheatley@inuxi.UUCP (Steven Wheatley) (01/24/86)

  
                           /\  
                          /  \ 
                         / A  \ 
                        /      \   
        ===============/        \============== 
              THE     / R      R \   LETTER 
            VOLUME 5  \          /  NUMBER 01 
        ===============\        /============== 
                        \      / 
                         \ L  / 
                          \  /   
                           \/ 
                                           
 
                    January 02, 1986 
 
    The ARRL Letter is published bi-weekly by the Information 
Services Department of the American Radio Relay League, 225 Main 
St., Newington, CT, 06111; (203) 666-1541. Larry E. Price, W4RA, 
President; David Sumner, K1ZZ, Executive Vice President; Dave 
Newkirk, AK7M, Editor; Debra Chapor, Circulation Manager.

    Information from The ARRL Letter may be reproduced in whole 
or part in any form including photoreproduction and electronic 
databanks, providing credit is given to The ARRL Letter and to 
the American Radio Relay League. 
 
The ARRL Letter is available in printed form from ARRL. 
Subscriptions, limited to ARRL Members, are $19.50 (U.S. funds) 
per year for First-Class Mailing to the U.S., Canada, and 
Mexico. Overseas air mail subscriptions are available at $31 
(U.S. funds) per year. Sample copies are available for an 
s.a.s.e. 
                              
 

    The Executive Committee of the ARRL Board of Directors met in 
Atlanta, Georgia, on December 14, 1985. Here are highlights; the 
full minutes will appear in QST:

    The Committee considered an ARRL position regarding RM-5241, 
the petition by Donald Stoner, W6TNS, for the creation of a 
Public Digital Radio Service (PDRS) and reallocation of the 52-54 
MHz band from the Amateur Service to the PDRS. Counsel was 
directed to file comments by the deadline of January 6, 1985, 
vigorously opposing the reallocation of 52-54 MHz. (Details of 
RM-5241 elsewhere this Letter.)

    Pertaining to Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), this 
resolution was unanimously adopted:

     Whereas, RF susceptibility of the 
  current generation of VCRs and other 
  home electronic devices is a growing 

  problem; and

     Whereas, the public is not aware 
  that responsibility for RF 
  susceptibility of VCRs and other home 
  electronic devices lies with the manu
  facturers of such equipment rather than 
  with Amateur Radio stations operating 
  in the vicinity of these devices; and

     Whereas, technical solutions -- 
  while being pursued through special 
  committees of the American National 
  Standards Institute (e.g., ANSI C-63) 
  and by other routes -- will not have a 
  favorable impact on equipment reaching 
  consumers in the near term; now,

     Therefore, Counsel is instructed to 
  prepare for filing, after review at the 
  1986 Annual Meeting of the Board, a 
  petition requiring the labelling of 
  home electronic equipment, with regard 
  to its susceptibility to RF energy, the 
  filing to emphasize that such labelling 
  is no substitute for technical solu
  tions in the longer term.
                            
    The Executive Committee completed its review of Morse Code 
examination procedures as called for at Minute 66 of the 1985 
Second Meeting (see page 57, September 1985 QST). The EC 
concluded that there was no immediate need to revise the Rules in 
Part 97. However, the Executive Committee recognized that 
consistency of standards in the examination program continues to 
be a desirable objective, and the President is requested to 
continue to pursue this with Commission personnel as appropriate, 
keeping the Morse as well as the written test in mind.

    Amateur recruitment. To increase the number of amateurs 
licensed by FCC will require a cross-disciplinary coordinated 
effort, which is difficult if not impossible through a separate 
Development Office. Thus the Development Office is being closed, 
and other organizational changes will be made. (See "HQ Shifts 
Gears," this Letter.) The following elements of an amateur 
recruitment program are contemplated for 1986:
          
   a) An assertive effort through radio 
   clubs.

   b) Newsstand publication.

   c) Use of a professional public 
   relations firm for such projects as 
   the placement of articles in non-ama-
   teur publications for targeted groups.


   d) Cooperation with youth groups and 
   senior-citizen organizations.

   e) Revised instructor guides.

   f) "How to Become" information 
   tailored to the targeted groups.

    The International Amateur Radio Union Secretary, David 
Sumner, K1ZZ, presented a brief oral report on the IARU 
Administrative Council meeting in Melbourne, Australia, and 
Auckland, New Zealand, November 8, 9 and 11, 1985. It was made 
clear that the Council's discussion of a possible World 
Administra tive Radio Conference in the early 1990s (as has been 
postulated by International Telecommunication Union Secretary 
General Richard Butler) in no way implied IARU endorsement of 
such a WARC being held.

 HEADQUARTERS SHIFTS GEARS TO MEET GROWTH CHALLENGE

    For the year 1985, ARRL enjoyed an in crease in membership of 
approximately 15,000. While this is short of the ambi tious goal 
of a 25,000 increase this year, +it's by far the largest 
membership increase since the CB-boom year of 1977, and quite 
likely the largest in the League's history in a year that did not 
see a similar in crease in the number of licensed amateurs.

    The continuation of this success on the membership front will 
require more than a "rerun" of 1985 techniques. The reason for 
this is that we've yet to make any measurable progress on the 
recruitment front -- that's "recruitment" as in more radio 
amateurs. Figures for upgrading from one license class to another 
look promising, but the rate of first-time entry into Amateur 
Radio actually declined in the FCC fiscal year ending September 
30, with similar results for October and November. More radio 
amateurs means a stronger Amateur Radio in government eyes.

    ARRL's Executive Vice President has determined that the 
revised HQ organizational structure, adopted last year (see "HQ 
Reorganization" in the January 17, 1985 Letter), has not given 
the League the best means of tackling the recruitment task. 
Writes EVP David Sumner, K1ZZ: "The only effective way to deal 
with a challenge as large as Amateur Radio recruitment is to 
mobilize all the available resources, regardless of the 
department in which they may happen to reside. Assigning the 
respon sibility to a single office, with a relatively small 
staff, doesn't get the job done unless there is some mechanism 
for tapping into the resources of other departments. Accordingly, 
as we close out the year we have set the wheels in motion for a 
reorganizing of the development function, to focus our resources 
as effectively as possible on the recruitment challenge." How 
will HQ respond to this challenge?

    The Development office is being phased out. Existing 

personnel in Newington will continue to perform their functions 
(training, audio/visual, referrals of prospective hams to clubs 
and Elmers, etc.) but will be reassigned to a new Club Services 
Department in the Volunteer Resources Group.

    The membership promotion function is reassigned to the 
Publications Group, and more specifically to the Circulation 
Department.

    The function of providing support to the section-level and 
local Public Information Assistants and Public Information 
Officers will be assigned to the Club Services Department.

    Coordination of the recruitment function will become a staff 
function in the office of the Executive Vice President, through 
the chairing of a multi-department Task Force on Recruitment. It 
will be the mission of the Task Force to develop a detailed 
recruitment plan, including specific task assignments to 
departments.

    Representing the League to the national media also will be 
done by the office of the Executive Vice President. Several 
personnel shifts are being made to complete the picture:

    Joining the EVP's staff in mid-January as Senior Staff 
Advisor for Planning and Operations is Karl Muller, W3UBQ. Karl 
recently took early retirement after a 35-year career with Gulf 
Oil, and is relocating to Connecticut from Houston. His 
background in financial and customer service operations will add 
considerable depth to the staff.

    Curt Holsopple, K9CH, will become Manager of the new Club 
Services Department, effective the first of the year.

    Jim Clary, WB9IHH, Assistant Manager of the Volunteer 
Examiner Department, will become Manager of the department.

    Watch this space for more news as ARRL tackles the challenge 
of the eighties. Hint: you're the most important part of it.

 PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE WOULD GOBBLE HALF OF SIX-METER BAND

    What has one watt, four letters and wants to eat two 
megahertz? Answer: the PDRS (Public Digital Radio Service) sought 
for in a Petition for Rulemaking (RM-5241), brought before FCC by 
Donald L. Stoner, W6TNS. Citing the rising popularity and falling 
prices of computers, and juxtaposing these with increasing costs 
for telephone service, Stoner proposes that the PDRS would permit 
the owners of personal computers to communicate by radio, first 
through Local Area Networks (LAN) and, beyond LANs, through a 
national packet radio network. Transmitter power would be limited 
to a maximum of one watt in a given user's "radio modem," with 
output power being adjusted automatically to the minimum needed 
for communication. There's one immediate hitch, from Amateur 
Radio's point of view. Writes the petitioner:


    "A wideband digital channel can only be accommodated with the 
VHF band or higher frequencies. To keep the cost of equipment 
low, a band between 30 and 300 MHz is ideal. Some readers may 
feel that a service as described should be placed in the UHF or 
SHF range. This might be true if a suitable allocation within the 
30-300 MHz band did not exist.

    "However, within this frequency range there is a band, 2 MHz 
in width, which is virtually unoccupied and therefore unused. I 
refer to the spectrum between 52 and 54 MHz.

    "Radio amateurs are permitted to operate on frequencies 
between 50 and 54 MHz (the six meter band). For a number of 
reasons, this band is 'underoccupied.' It is estimated that out 
of 400,000 radio amateurs in the United States, less than 1000 
are active on the six meter band . . . "

    The opinion of the petitioner is that most amateur operation 
is confined to the bottom two MHz of "Six" because of television 
interference; the proposed low power used by "radio modems" in 
the PDRS would obviate their causing TVI. Check an ARRL Repeater 
Directory lately? 52-54 MHz is where repeaters reside on six, and 
they're doing quite well, thanks.

    Next Letter, we'll detail ARRL's response to RM-5241; the 
League's Executive Committee has already made the gist of its 
position known (see "EC Meeting," this Let ter). It's not the 
proposal for the service that's the bone of contention, 
understand -- it's just that Amateur Radio intends to go right on 
keeping that top two megahertz of six exclusively within the 
Amateur Radio realm.

 ARRL FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIPS AVAILABLE

    The ARRL Foundation announces the availability of three 
scholarship awards for the 1986-87 school year. Based on high 
academic standing, financial need and dedi cation to public 
service through Amateur Radio, these awards are provided through 
the generosity of individual sponsors and donors:

   The Perry F. Hadlock Memorial Scholar
   ship of $500 will be awarded to a 
   student of electrical engineering. It 
   is open to licensed radio amateurs of 
   the General, or higher, class.

   The Paul and Helen L. Grauer award of 
   $500 will be given to a student of 
   electronics, communications engi
   neering or related fields who resides 
   in and attends an accredited college 
   or university in the Midwest Division 
   of the ARRL.


   The You Have a Friend in Pennsylvania 
   scholarship is available for the first 
   time in the l986-87 academic year. It 
   will be awarded to a League member who 
   maintains academic excellence.

Further information and application forms for these awards may be 
obtained by writing to the ARRL Foundation Scholarships, 225 Main 
Street, Newington CT 06111.

 COMMISSION UPHOLDS DENIAL OF PROPOSAL TO 
ESTABLISH AUXILIARY MONITORING SERVICE IN ALL RADIO SERVICES

    In 1982, Congress amended the Communica tions Act to 
authorize the Commission to use volunteers in the Amateur and 
Citizens Band Radio Services to monitor violations of the 
Communications Act and FCC rules. In the fall of 1984, a 
volunteer Amateur Auxiliary was established pursuant to an 
agreement with ARRL concerning the training and administration of 
the auxiliary. The pur pose of the Amateur Auxiliary is to foster 
wider knowledge of Commission rules, conduct monitoring of the 
Amateur Radio Service frequencies to encourage compliance with 
the rules and good operating practices, develop solutions to 
problems arising from the operation of amateur stations, and to 
under take specific projects as the need arises.

    FCC has upheld a staff decision denying a proposal by John P. 
Weber, Jr., K4JW, Melbourne, Florida, to establish a volunteer 
auxiliary monitoring service in all radio services. Weber 
proposed an auxiliary monitoring service in all radio services 
involving volunteers working under direct FCC supervision. The 
Chief, Field Operations Bureau (FOB), denied the petition on the 
basis that Congress had only authorized the Commission to use 
volunteers in the Amateur and Citizens Band Radio Ser vices; that 
federal law precludes such voluntary and uncompensated service 
other than in these two services; that the Communications Act 
prohibits the intercep tion and disclosure of radio signals by 
volunteers in most other radio services; that establishment of an 
auxiliary for all radio services at once would be too broad and 
ambitious a project for for effective FCC oversight and 
supervision; and that since the Commission's regulatory emphasis 
in a number of services has concerned signal analysis, the 
expense of appropriate equip ment and necessary training may be 
prohibi tive. 

    As part of his application for review, Weber contended, among 
other matters, that under his proposal there was no need for an 
intermediate organization such as the ARRL, and that volunteers 
would be considered agents of the Commission and protected by 
federal law. He further contended that the FOB-ARRL agreement 
violated the procedural requirements of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, could cause violations of federal and Florida laws 
concerning the interception and disclosure of oral 
communications, and had practical problems regarding 
reimbursement by the ARRL for certain volunteer monitoring 

expenses, travel expenses, and participation by all interested 
amateurs. Weber asserted that the ARRL does not speak for the 
majority of amateurs, and that his proposal would result in a 
more effective volunteer organization for the benefit of the 
Commission. 

    The Commission found no merit in the further contentions 
raised by Weber in his application for review. It noted that the 
most efficient development of an amateur volunteer auxiliary is 
through large organi zations such as the ARRL, particularly when 
such organizations bring with them extensive experience with 
prior self-regulation ef forts and other volunteer experience. It 
noted further that the Amateur Auxiliary is a Commission program 
to be administered, in large measure, by the ARRL and any other 
national or regional organization that has a similar type of 
agreement with FOB. It stated that the Amateur Auxiliary is still 
in its developmental stage and that FOB will be monitoring its 
effectiveness in accomplishing the Congressional intent in 
authorizing the volunteer service.
    (K4JW became a Silent Key before FCC's denial was released -- 
Editor.)

YOU USE YOUR CALL, WE'LL USE OURS

    In June of last year it came to the League's attention that a 
low-power TV station in Columbus, Ohio, was visually identi fying 
as W8BV. The real W8BV is Stuart M. Brooks of Portland, Michigan; 
the assigned callsign of the LPTV station is W08BV. It's a no-no 
for LPTV stations to omit the "leading zero" from their calls, as 
directed by Section 74.783(d) of the Rules:

   The channel number designator for 
   Channels 3 through 9 will be incorpo
   rated in the call sign as a 2-digit 
   number, i.e., 02, 03, . . . so as to 
   avoid similarities with call signs 
   assigned to amateur radio stations.

    As late as November 4, 1985, the W8BV callsign was still 
being used by the LPTV station. However, a November 19 report by 
ARRL's Washington Area Coordinator brought the news that the LPTV 
had finally cleaned up its act -- with the new logo's zero 
looking more like an "O." QRA?

NEW CONTEST CERTIFICATES ON THE WAY

    The ARRL Contest Branch has new contest certificates on the 
drawing board -- this has put our normal certificate mailings 
behind their usual schedule. A sneak peek over the necessary 
shoulder indicates the revised articles will be well worth a few 
more weeks' wait: 8-1/2 by 11 inches and horizontal format with 
screened map backgrounds. Stand by!

IT'S ALL OVER BUT THE QSLING


    Results of the December 28-29 W1AW bash: 809 phone QSOs, 732 
CW -- a total of 1541! We even enjoyed a little late-night "E" on 
10. QSLs answered 100% -- let's have yours!

*eof