rommel@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Kai-Uwe Rommel) (05/19/91)
In article <9154565@bfmny0.BFM.COM> tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes: >In article <BsqX21w164w@kaiki.toppoint.de> kai@kaiki.toppoint.de (Kai Voelcker) writes: >>hv@uwasa.fi (Harri Valkama) writes: >>> HEY! I think there are OS/2-ONLY lists for these OS/2 discussions. >>> PLEASE. I don't want to read about OS/2 from MS-WINDOWS / MS-DOS >>> lists. >>Really, he is right !! >>Or should I have to write a program that munges this OS/2 into junk? > >Yes, you go do that. Don't wait, get started right away. Oh, boy. Better write a program that munges WINDOWS into junk! But you don't have to - Windows already *is* junk, completely (I know what I am speaking of, believe me, I am developing Windows software). Well, you may say, the market demands Windows and MANY use it, but this remembers me of a joke I read somewhere: Eat sh*t, million flies cannot be wrong ... Kai Uwe Rommel /* Kai Uwe Rommel, Munich ----- rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de */ DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt handler, and always will be. -Russell Williams