[comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware] AMI BIOS/faster POST not necessarily better

Robert.Berry@samba.acs.unc.edu (BBS Account) (08/14/90)

To be honest, I'd rather have no POST at all.  I have never *once* had a
POST turn up any problems with any memory.  I have on occasion had bad
memory chips, and I've got plenty of diagnostic software to help me find
it.  Considering that, if I'm at the keyboard, I'll skip the POST by 
hitting Esc anyway, I don't really care how "stringent" it is.

martin@hq.af.mil (Gregory.J.Martin) (08/15/90)

In article <803@beguine.UUCP> Robert.Berry@samba.acs.unc.edu (BBS Account) writes:
>To be honest, I'd rather have no POST at all.  I have never *once* had a
>POST turn up any problems with any memory.  I have on occasion had bad
>memory chips, and I've got plenty of diagnostic software to help me find
>it.  Considering that, if I'm at the keyboard, I'll skip the POST by 
>hitting Esc anyway, I don't really care how "stringent" it is.

I have an old IBM PC and the POST finds memory errors regularly.  When a
machine starts to age, memory goes bad and I'd rather find out about it during
bootup than after my editor's written some data there and winds up with
garbage.  But, I guess that's why the Constitution allow for life liberty and
the pursuit of happiness(or was that the D of I?). 
...Greg