[comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware] Summary: VGA Recommendations

sip1@quads.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) (06/27/91)

The follow are the responses I got re: VGA recommendations.  I decided to
ignore them all (:-)) and go with a friend's recommendation.

Thanks to all who responded.

T.F.S.
Timothy F. Sipples				sip1@quads.uchicago.edu

--- Responses Follow ---

From MLWLG%CUNYVM.BITNET@UCHIMVS1.UCHICAGO.EDU Mon Jun 24 11:14:01 1991

Rec:

1) If you're going to look at multi-information formatted screen, i.e.,
   lots of underlines, highlites, et cetera.  For instance, if you're
   working in a programming environment, then get a color monitor. Why?
   there a lot of info in color.

2) I've found no need for S-vga, stuff, unless you've got the s/w
   that *reqiures* it to run optimlly---otherwise, forget it.

3) Make certain that the vga card does not interfere w/ your drives.

--Sorry, I've no brand names. But I've found Samsung to cheap and ok.

From gordon@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu Mon Jun 24 12:29:48 1991
From: John Gordon <gordon@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu>

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware you write:
>I am looking for a high quality VGA monitor, something that I wouldn't mind
>staring at through long projects.
>I was thinking of getting a Sony 1320 (?) VGA monitor, but I am open to
>any and all suggestions.  Ideally the monitor should have a good combination
>of features.  Low dot pitch (.28 or below), flat screen, 14 inch diagonal
>measure, and tilt/swivel base are important.  Ability to go to 800x600,
>70Hz+ refresh rate, multisync (rather than multi fixed frequency), and
>NTSC composite support would also be nice.  Price is a factor but not the
>most important.  (The Sony violates some of these criteria, I'm aware,
>but I understand it is an outstanding VGA monitor.)
>The following features are not important (to me): 1024x768 modes (interlaced
>or not), "low radiation" (the quotes are deliberate), and jumbo monitors.
>I am also looking for a good VGA card, a simple 16 bit card with all the
>standard VGA modes plus 640x400x256, 640x480x256, and 800x600x16 (if the
>monitor goes that high).  Support for 70Hz+ refresh rates also nice.
>OS/2 1.3 driver support for these three modes would also be nice.
>Mail order sources would also be appreciated.

	I would recommend the combo that I have: The Sony 1304 monitor and
the Diamond SpeedStar video card.  I bought mine from MicroLine Inc. in
California. (415) 770-1900.   The monitor goes for about $640, the card
about $230.

John

From baer@uwovax.uwo.ca Mon Jun 24 12:51:56 1991
From: Doug Baer <baer@uwovax.uwo.ca>

For now, avoid ATI.  Their Wonder card (/Wonder+) has OS/2 drivers,
but only for PM 1.1.  They only partially work, if at all, for OS/2
1.3.  ATI promised 1.2 drivers last December (their line up until
late Nov.), then cancelled the project, saying they "might" work
on drivers when OS/2 2.0 came out.  Now their party line is that they
are working on 1.3 drivers for some "unspecified date".  I'll believe
it when I see it.  
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Baer, 
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5C2
Internet: BAER@UWO.CA    Bitnet: BAER@UWOVAX

From baer@uwovax.uwo.ca Mon Jun 24 21:31:36 1991
From: Doug Baer <baer@uwovax.uwo.ca>

I have heard of other manufacturers with 256 color drivers, but I cannot
remember the names right now.  If I see any info., I'll let you know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Baer, 
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5C2
Internet: BAER@UWO.CA    Bitnet: BAER@UWOVAX