[net.travel] travel tip

bennison@tools.DEC (01/07/85)

---
>When contacting tourist bureaus ask for complete listings of lodgings with
>prices and detailed maps.  Usually the complete listings are free and some-
>times the maps cost a small amount but are worth it.

Good luck!  I tried this with Canada and Great Britain.  No such thing!
A book listing all the bed and breakfasts in England would be the size of
the London phone book.  There is no government supplied road map of Great
Britain that comes close to the commercially available maps, such as
Michelin, for detail and ease of use, period!  Maybe other countries are
different, but I'll remain skeptical.

>If you just ask for general information they will send you the junky tourist
>literature that they hope will convince you to buy a tour.  If you are travel-
>ing on your own you have to tell them that and give dates and ask for specific
>information.  

I have talked myself blue trying to tell them exactly what information I 
wanted about which places or regions.  Very frustrating.

>My experience has been that going through an American travel
>agent for foreign accommodations and tours just about doubles the cost of
>doing it yourself when you get there or going through their US representative
>before you leave.  

There have been recent articles on the net concerning the difference between
a good travel agent and a bad one.  I've never used one myself.  I always make
my own arrangements with excellent results.

>Regarding books and bookstores, 
>1) They are designed to make money for the author and publisher.

So I go to the store before traveling and spend $25-$50 on books and maps.
Big deal!  Have you ever seen anything negative written about a place in
a government brochure?  I've never seen one with a rating system of any kind.
Government tourist bureaus are designed to make money for the country, not for
any altruistic reasons.  I don't see much difference in motives, but at least
the author and publisher are under no pressure to avoid embarrassing this region
or that city, and are, therefore, more likely to give them a bum review when 
they deserve it.

>2) They are designed to appeal to a specific audience (budget, luxury, etc)

I am a specific audience.  I want to be appealed to.  I want to be able to
say, "give me a guidebook that would be of interest to a moderately affluent
but not rich person travelling with a wife and two kids by rental car who wants
inexpensive but clean accomodations, interesting historic and scenic sights,
and good regional food."

>3) They contain material that is at least 1 year old and not guaranteed.

One year old!  One year old!  My god what do you want?  I'd take a ten year
old Michelin guide to Paris over a brand new French government brochure on
the same subject any day.  If you think the foreign travel bureaus guarantee
their information as accurate I think you're dreaming.

>4) They can only comment on those places which they have time to visit.

There are all kinds of guide books.  If you want infinite detail, look at a
Blue Guides.  They don't miss anything.  I prefer the less detailed more 
selective but still very complete guides, such as the Michelin.

>5) They miss many if not all small but nice places.  

These are not covered in the government brochures.  There are just too many of
them.  In Europe you can't go to the privy without stumbling over one or two
of them on the way.  Give me a break!

>In some places like Northern Europe, I have never found a place that was not
>clean.  The only choice is price and convenience.

I've found some gawd-awful dumps in Northern Europe, believe me.  But once you
get somewhere you can usually find very decent accomodations.  The question is,
once you get somewhere, are you SOMEWHERE in which you really have any 
interest in being.

>P.S.  That junky literature about tour routes is great in planning your own
>route and gives you an idea as to what one should look for.

I never said it couldn't be useful.  I always order the stuff myself for 
planning purposes.  But I've always found it necessary to supplement it 
heavily with commercial material.

    				Vick Bennison
    				...decvax!decwrl!rhea!tools!bennison
    				(603) 881-2156

2141smh@aluxe.UUCP (henning) (01/08/85)

****                                                                 ****
From the keys of Steve Henning, AT&T Bell Labs, Reading, PA aluxe!2141smh

> Good luck!  I tried this with Canada and Great Britain.  No such thing!

In Canada you have to deal with the individual provinces.  Believe it or not
Labrador & Newfoundland has some of the most complete literature and some
of the most interesting scenery and areas. 
For Great Britain you almost have to visit their Tourist Office in NYC which
has 2 rooms chuck full of really good information.  Most of the information
costs about 40% more than if you wait until you get to GB.  On our recent
trip to Scotland, we did get a government listing of all B&B's which
was invaluable since in northwestern Scotland there aren't very many and
in southcentral they tend to fill up fast.  By the way, we made a point
to hit the NYC Tourist Office 2 hours before our flight out of JFK.  The 
clerk had told me which books to look at and it worked out fine.

> But I've always found it necessary to supplement it 
> heavily with commercial material.

I agree that tour books are good, but some of the best ones are written in
the country you intend to visit for their own people and are sold through
Tourist Offices such as the ones for Great Britain and Scandinavia.

doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) (01/09/85)

> A book listing all the bed and breakfasts in England would be the size of
> the London phone book.

Aw, c'mon, the London phone book ain't THAT big.  Jeepers, it seems like
every farmhouse in England has a "B&B" sign out front.  Almost a blight
on the countryside :-)

Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{hao,ihnp4,decvax}!noao!terak!doug

daver@hp-pcd.UUCP (daver) (01/23/85)

Here in the Pacific Northwest the best roadmaps I've found are printed by the
state government for free distribution.  I picked up my maps of Oregon and
Washington at the respective state capitol buildings, but I'm sure the state
tourist offices would be happy to send you one (ask for the state highway map).
They are much more usable than the AAA maps, and more up-to-date too.

As for arranging lodging in advance, any area which appeals to tourists will
have a large number of motels, most of which are not listed with any travel
agency or in any brochure.  For example, several years ago I attended Wescon
at the Anaheim convention center across from Disneyland.  I had made no 
reservations at all, but when I arrived there I found the whole place 
surrounded by motels advertising single rooms for $18 and doubles for $24 
(plus tax), and got a room at that price with a full kitchenette right down the
block from the convention hall.  A couple of years later my company sent me 
down there for NCC and put me up at a motel almost a mile from the convention 
center.  The room wasn't as nice as the one I had stayed in the last time and 
cost $65 per night.  I checked and found that there were still vacancies at the
$18/night motels, despite the largest NCC in history (the one with the infamous
tents whose airconditioning failed).  Last fall I visited Disney World and 
found it surrounded by motels advertising similar room rates.  If you are 
willing to take a chance, or are traveling off season, it may be a good idea 
not to make room reservations.  Good luck.

Dave Rabinowitz
hp-pcd!daver