[net.followup] never believe what you read in t

porges@inmet.UUCP (07/26/83)

#R:fortune:-128200:inmet:4000008:000:356
inmet!porges    Jul 22 12:29:00 1983

	How is the "water is an intoxicant" example not a good example of
scientific method?  Because after you try scotch-and-water, bourbon-and-water,
gin-and-water, you do not then CONCLUDE "water is an intoxicant" -- you
make that a hypothesis.  Then, obviously, you test it with just water.  And
that is why this criticism of scientific method is incorrect.

ecn-ec:ecn-pc:ecn-ed:vu@pur-ee.UUCP (07/29/83)

	This is not the only one. Recently ( sometime last June ), TIME
magazine reviews a book written by some philosopher claiming that Einstein's
Relativity has a bad impact on society because it (Relativity) asserts that
Physics is dependent of point of view !! And of course, since it was written
by a Humanities major and reviewed by another Humanities major, nobody ever
realized that one of the two basic assumption of Relativity is that "the
laws of Physics are the same in all inertial frame". How much longer
will Americans read such articles and believe that it IS science ? And
imagine that they will grow up and become LL D's and MBA's; what will
happen to America THEN ?

				Hao-Nhien Vu
				pur-ee!vu