dcb@dave.mis.semi.harris.com (Dave Brillhart) (06/03/91)
I've finally found time to start programming in the wonderful
world of Motif. A friend recommended the Marshall Brain
Tutorials (a great tip). I can't seem to get the first "Hello World"
program to compile... I'm sure it's some kind of setup problem.
(BTW, I can compile most other x programs except mxrn. The
only commonality I could find was mxrn also uses <Xm.h>.)
I'm running Ultrix 4.1 on a DECstation 5000. I loaded OSF/Motif
1.1. That MAY be the problem right there - I've read 4.1 is based
on R3 intrinisics while Motiif 1.1 is R4??? Any conformation on
that? What follows is the program and error message (same thing
happens with or without the commented lines):
Thanks in advance for and comments,
Dave Brillhart
Harris Semiconductor
Melbourne, FL
=======================================================
#include <X11/Intrinsic.h>
#include <Xm/Xm.h>
#include <Xm/Label.h>
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
Widget toplevel; Arg al[10]; int ac=0;
toplevel = XtInitialize(argv[0],"",NULL,0,&argc,argv);
/*
XtSetArg(al[ac++],XmNlabelString,XmStringCreate("hello",XmSTRING_DEFAULT
T_CHARSET));
msg = XtCreateManagedWidget("msg",xmLabelWidgetClass,toplevel,al,ac);
*/
XtRealizeWidget(toplevel);
XtMainLoop();
}
===========================================================
ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: syntax error
typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)();
-------------------^
ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: function returns
illegal type
typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)();
-----------------------------------------^
ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2020: syntax error
XmResourceBaseProc base_proc;
---------------------^
(ccom): /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2020: cannot recover from earlier
errors: goodbye!
XmResourceBaseProc base_proc;
----------------------------------^dbrooks@osf.org (06/03/91)
In article <1991Jun3.124344.4245@mlb.semi.harris.com> you write: |> I'm running Ultrix 4.1 on a DECstation 5000. I loaded OSF/Motif |> 1.1. That MAY be the problem right there - I've read 4.1 is based |> on R3 intrinisics while Motiif 1.1 is R4??? Any conformation on |> that? If DEC is shipping Motif 1.1, they'll be shipping X11R4 Intrinsics. There Is No Alternative. |> What follows is the program and error message But you omitted the "cc" command :-) |> ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: syntax error |> typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)(); |> -------------------^ (etc...) At 1.1.1, we (finally) implemented full ANSI prototyping. Although the Ultrix MIPS cc does prototyping, it doesn't quite match the ANSI requirements. If you add "-D_NO_PROTO" to your cc line, you'll be able to get over this hurdle. You might like to hack it into your imake templates, or even (I don't recommend this) your local Xm.h. I believe a Sun cc has the identical problem. -- David Brooks dbrooks@osf.org Systems Engineering, OSF uunet!osf.org!dbrooks
klee@wsl.dec.com (Ken Lee) (06/03/91)
In article <1991Jun3.124344.4245@mlb.semi.harris.com>, dcb@dave.mis.semi.harris.com (Dave Brillhart) writes: |> ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: syntax error |> typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)(); |> -------------------^ This is a common problem for people compiling programs on systems supporting multiple versions of the X Toolkit. On DECstations, the Xt include files in /usr/include/X11 are for the XUI intrinsics. The Motif intrinsics (X11R4) include files are in /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xt/X11 (DXV instead of DXM for VAXes), so you should put a -I/usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xt in your Makefile. -- Ken Lee DEC Western Software Laboratory, Palo Alto, Calif. Internet: klee@wsl.dec.com uucp: uunet!decwrl!klee
dbrooks@osf.org (06/04/91)
In article <1991Jun3.090241@wsl.dec.com>, klee@wsl.dec.com (Ken Lee) writes: |> include files in /usr/include/X11 are for the XUI intrinsics. The |> Motif intrinsics (X11R4) include files are in /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xt/X11 |> (DXV instead of DXM for VAXes), so you should put a |> -I/usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xt in your Makefile. And I wrote: |> If you add "-D_NO_PROTO" to your cc line, you'll be able to get over this |> hurdle. I prefer Ken's answer :-) It seems that DEC's product does not have the problem to which I was referring, if you do the right thing. My advice still holds if you are using our generic source, 1.1.1 or greater, and MIPS cc 1.31. Here, I get the following errors with prototyping on; they are not the same as those originally posted: ccom: Error: /usr/include/Motif1.1.1/Xm/Xm.h, line 1764: redeclaration of XmColorProc XmColorProc XmSetColorCalculation(XmColorProc proc); --------------------------------^ ccom: Error: /usr/include/Motif1.1.1/Xm/Xm.h, line 1764: syntax error XmColorProc XmSetColorCalculation(XmColorProc proc); --------------------------------^ ccom: Error: /usr/include/Motif1.1.1/Xm/Xm.h, line 1765: redeclaration of XmColorProc XmColorProc XmGetColorCalculation(void); --------------------------------^ ccom: Error: /usr/include/Motif1.1.1/Xm/Xm.h, line 1984: syntax error XmResourceBaseProc base_proc; ---------------------^ (ccom): /usr/include/Motif1.1.1/Xm/Xm.h, line 1984: cannot recover from earlier errors: goodbye! XmResourceBaseProc base_proc; ----------------------------------^ -- David Brooks dbrooks@osf.org Systems Engineering, OSF uunet!osf.org!dbrooks
yzarn@lhdsy1.chevron.com (Philip Yzarn de Louraille) (06/06/91)
In article <1991Jun3.124344.4245@mlb.semi.harris.com> dcb@dave.mis.semi.harris.com (Dave Brillhart) writes: >I've finally found time to start programming in the wonderful >world of Motif. A friend recommended the Marshall Brain >Tutorials (a great tip). I can't seem to get the first "Hello World" >program to compile... I'm sure it's some kind of setup problem. >(BTW, I can compile most other x programs except mxrn. The >only commonality I could find was mxrn also uses <Xm.h>.) > >I'm running Ultrix 4.1 on a DECstation 5000. I loaded OSF/Motif >1.1. That MAY be the problem right there - I've read 4.1 is based >on R3 intrinisics while Motiif 1.1 is R4??? Any conformation on >that? > >=========================================================== >ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: syntax error > typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)(); > -------------------^ >ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: function returns >illegal type > typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)(); > -----------------------------------------^ >ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2020: syntax error > XmResourceBaseProc base_proc; > ---------------------^ >(ccom): /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2020: cannot recover from earlier >errors: goodbye! > XmResourceBaseProc base_proc; > ----------------------------------^ Yes, Ultrix 4.1 is X11R3 but the X librairies delivered with the software are *supposed* to be X11R4 compatible (?, what is that supposed to mean?) Motif 1.1 is X11R4. The third error signifies that the compiler does not know anything about XmResourceBaseProc. Probably because it is only found in R4 of X. Why don't you try *linting* your code before compiling it, you may get more detailed messages. (I always lint before I compile, saves me lots of time.) -- Philip Yzarn de Louraille Internet: yzarn@chevron.com Research Support Division Unix & Open Systems Chevron Information & Technology Co. Tel: (213) 694-9232 P.O. Box 446, La Habra, CA 90633-0446 Fax: (213) 694-7709
david@lta.lta.com (06/10/91)
> But you omitted the "cc" command :-) Yes; the problem is that the default header files are R3. The R4 ones are tucked somewhere else on the system, if they're present. Find them and use -I. > |> ccom: Error: /usr/lib/DXM/lib/Xm/Xm.h, line 2017: syntax error > |> typedef XtPointer (*XmResourceBaseProc)(); > |> -------------------^ -- David B. Lewis Lewis, Trachtenberg & Associates (LTA) david@lta.com +1 617 225 0366 Some financial models, on the other hand, yield a positive societal value for a pack of cigarettes: smokers ... inflate group life-insurance premiums, but they tend to die before costing society much in pensions or nursing-home care. - SA
mueller@daisy.cis.ohio-state.edu (klaus d mueller) (06/12/91)
Someone knows ??
I'm having problems with my swap space being too small. So I thought about
creating a big file and using SWAPON <file name> to add this file to my swap
space. Will this create a problem when the file is not written in contiguous
blocks ?
OR
Is there a way to divide an existing partition into two pieces without
having to re-format the entire hard disk ?
I have a DECStation 3100 running ULTRIX version 3. Thank's for your help.
Cheers Klaus@lvd1.bme.ohio-state.edu