brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) (11/08/90)
In article <9011060500.AA01783@wubios.wustl.edu> david@WUBIOS.WUSTL.EDU (David J. Camp) writes: > Except for > the fact that the "Permissions and Restrictions for Copying" is > called a "License", there is nothing in the law as I understand > it that suggests that a contract exists. The fact that it is called a license is enough to make it a license. Sorry, but if you misuse legal terms in a legal document, you deserve what you get. I also question your implication that Stallman actually intended the GNU Public License to not be a license. ---Dan