pochron@cat52.cs.wisc.edu (David Pochron) (12/14/90)
In article <49653@cornell.UUCP> johnhlee@cs.cornell.edu (John H. Lee) writes: >In article <1990Dec12.114250@avahi.inria.fr> colas@avahi.inria.fr (Colas Nahaboo) writes: >> >>(*) As an example: Seems to me that using two concurrent processes to read >>MSDOS disks via MSH yields you corrupted buffer I/Os, but I'm not sure > >Wrong. Two concurrent processes accessing the disk will not corrupt buffers, >even if they use MSH. Before you make another blatently false statement >like that, you should learn about the system first and make sure you know >what you're talking about. You may be using an older version of MSH with >a bug in it. I do often exactly what you describe with no problems. If a Ahhh, I think you may be wrong - there is a bug in MSH somewhere, because I have SuperPlan and the LATEST version of MSH (the one w/o the requesters popping up all the time) and it crashes when used with MSH - saving a file seems to work, but as soon as I try to read it back, the system crashes. This does not happen when saving to Amiga disks. I haven't tried "mixing and matching" AmigaDOS and MSH filesystems and device drivers yet, and it may show specifically where the problem lies in MSH. I am following up this thread to c.s.a., as it doesn't belong here anymore. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David M. Pochron | from Rescue Rangers, _A Fly in the Ointment_ pochron@garfield.cs.wisc.edu| Gadget to Dale: "Keep the hands off the body!" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------