[comp.sys.mac.comm] Is MacLayers really *Layers* ???

jr@amanue.UUCP (Jim Rosenberg) (06/17/90)

I've been reading the traffic on MacLayers with some interest.  Maybe this was
addressed & I missed it -- if so please excuse.  Most folks running MacLayers
seem to be doing so on a BSD host.  uw already works on BSD, but as far as I
know *does not* work on a System V host.  On the other hand, AT&T invented a
protocol called Layers and has implemented it on many of its systems.  It's
what they use to multiplex many processes through a single connection for their
BLIT and other succeeding fancy terminals, e.g. 630, 730, etc.  I have both a
Mac and an AT&T 3b1.  The 3b1 does come with Layers.  Supposedly the Layers
stuff *does work* with AT&T's 630 terminal.  Methinks this is really where the
word "Layers" in MacLayers was originally supposed to have come from, but I
don't know if the current incarnation of MacLayers is really implementing the
AT&T Layers protocol in a compatible way.

Can I simply attach a Mac with MacLayers client side to my 3b1 and get it to
talk to the Layers host software that came with my machine?  Has anybody tried
this?
-- 
 Jim Rosenberg
     CIS: 71515,124                         decvax!idis! \
     WELL: jer                                   allegra! ---- pitt!amanue!jr
     BIX: jrosenberg                  uunet!cmcl2!cadre! /