davidl@tekid.UUCP (David Levadie) (09/02/83)
AHA!!! Here's the opportunity I've been waiting for to start a fight. Let's reopen the old argument about the relative merits of .22 and .25 caliber handguns. Maybe if we get absorb enough space, we will not only horrify everybody with discussions of impact energies and tissue damage, but - with any luck - force the institution of a net.guns so the normal majority can go back to their swords and potions and chain mail.
kenr@shark.UUCP (Ken Rhodes) (09/06/83)
The guy was shot in the face five times with a .22, managed to chase down and throttle his assailant *to death*, and was charged with murder? Wow! That's enough to shake your whole confidence in .22 caliber weapons! Your pal, Ken Rhodes
esj@ihuxl.UUCP (09/06/83)
I vote for the .25. I have a .25 Jetfire (tm) automatic with an eight shot clip plus one in the chamber. There's a bullet on the market called the "BAT Bullet" (tm) (stands for Blitz Action Trauma) that carries quite a bit more "punch". Makes the .25 almost as good as a .32. Why not net.psychopathic.handgunners? :-) ihnp4!ihuxl!esj