[net.followup] Well, actually...

jj@rabbit.UUCP (08/30/83)

	"It doesn't matter that the little old lady in question probably
	saved herself from physical harm, if not death, from these up-
	standing young gentlemen."  HEY!  How about thinking of the victim
	for once.  I'm getting sick and tired of hearing all the bleeding
	heart liberal garbage of protecting the criminals rights.  Some-
	where the rights of the victims have been forgotten.
	
	I am not saying that we should all go back to the days of the Old
	West and carry our Colt 45's, however let us not make the victim of
	a mugging, robbery, etc., a second victim just because they
	protected themselves from a crime.
	
				Scott E. Farleigh
				ATTIS Denver
	
	p.s. Please send mail to /dev/null.
	


Despite my feelings about "bleeding heart liberals", I can't attribute
the ignoring of victims to them.  I attribute it to mere (but utterly
blatant) stupidity, compounded with a healty dose of paranoia (the other
guy can't be trusted), selfishness (it's not ME, and she might hit me),
and fear(but if a LOL has a gun, what about that big <fillin>).

Somehow, I don't think that most of the peole who make statements
like that really understand that taking guns away from everybody will
REALLY only take guns away from LAW ABIDING CITIZENS!  Then, the only
two groups that will have guns will be criminals and rednecks.
Somehow, I don't think that's any improvement.

Please move comments/disputatious remarks to net.flame.  I'll be there.


rabbit!jj

john@hp-pcd.UUCP (John Eaton) (09/01/83)

#R:rabbit:-187800:hp-pcd:4100003:000:478
hp-pcd!john    Aug 31 13:30:00 1983

There is a bit of irony in the gun control laws that would require everyone
to register their firearms. Current federal laws prohibit criminals and 
convicted felons from possessing firearms and the constitution prohibits the
goverment from forcing anyone to incriminate themselves. Therefore criminals
would be exempt from gun control registration laws because to force them to
comply would be forcing them to convict themselves of a crime.


John Eaton

hplabs!hp-pcd!john

 

fran@cbscc.UUCP (09/07/83)

No, the fact that the criminal did not register the illegal
gun simply gives the prosecutor one more book to throw.  Use
of an illegal gun in the act of a felony is often given
a harder sentence than the felony itself might get.  Sort
of a double jeapardy operation.
					Frank Webb
					The unruffled sage