denton@parc.xerox.com (Jim Denton) (02/05/91)
Just one more note about Strategic Conquest 3.0 and then I'll shut up: The destroyer in the 2-player game moves 8! This is the way it should be. Now you can chase subs and transports just like in the 1-player (vs. computer) game. The transports are now much easier to kill. It was always frustrating to find an enemy transport just before it lands on your beach, and have it wipe out your entire air force. -- Jim Denton denton@parc.xerox.com All views are mine and mine alone, | Always INspect, never EXpect - ? but feel free to adopt them. | Don't Die Wondering - ?
jpf10694@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Joseph Peter Fleck) (02/13/91)
calvin@portia.stanford.edu (Peter Chang) writes: >In article <1991Feb4.234759.27127@parc.xerox.com> denton@parc.xerox.com (Jim >Denton) writes: >>Just one more note about Strategic Conquest 3.0 and then I'll >>shut up: >> >>The destroyer in the 2-player game moves 8! This is the way >>it should be. Now you can chase subs and transports just like >>in the 1-player (vs. computer) game. >> >>The transports are now much easier to kill. It was always >>frustrating to find an enemy transport just before it lands >>on your beach, and have it wipe out your entire air force. > I just called MacConnection like someone suggested, and they said that they >never heard of the beast. Does anybody else know of anyplace that would carry >it? > Thanks in advance, adn sorry for the wasted bandwidth. Am very new to this news network, so please forgive my inexperience. Did I understand these messages to assume that Strategic Conquest 3.0 actually does exist?thanks! -Joe D >PetrR
calvin@portia.stanford.edu (Peter Chang) (02/13/91)
In article (Joseph Peter Fleck) writes: > >Am very new to this news network, so please forgive my inexperience. Did I understand these messages to assume that Strategic Conquest 3.0 actually does exist?thanks! > -Joe >