[comp.sys.mac.system] A/UX 2.0 stability

graham@isis.ee.washington.edu (Stephen Graham) (09/13/90)

Just installed a IIfx networked into a Sun group. However, my boss didn't 
buy A/UX, claiming that someone had told him it was unstable. Therefore, no 
Unix, no NFS. Is A/UX 2.0 stable?

--------------------
Steve Graham
graham@isis.ee.washington.edu

brindle (Jack Brindle) (09/13/90)

In article <7423@milton.u.washington.edu> graham@isis.ee.washington.edu (Stephen Graham) writes:
>Just installed a IIfx networked into a Sun group. However, my boss didn't 
>buy A/UX, claiming that someone had told him it was unstable. Therefore, no 
>Unix, no NFS. Is A/UX 2.0 stable?

Yes, but the people who use it might not be...    :-)


- Jack Brindle.
- Signature under construction...

gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu (09/14/90)

In article <7423@milton.u.washington.edu> graham@isis.ee.washington.edu (Stephen Graham) writes:

>Just installed a IIfx networked into a Sun group. However, my boss didn't 
>buy A/UX, claiming that someone had told him it was unstable. Therefore, no 
>Unix, no NFS. Is A/UX 2.0 stable?
[...]

I don't really have an answer, since we just got 2.0 final, but thought this
should be cross-posted to comp.unix.aux for more answers.  Hope that seems
reasonable.


Robert

============================================================================
= gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu * generic disclaimer: * "It's more fun to =
=            		         * all my opinions are *  compute"         =
=                                * mine                *  -Kraftwerk       =
============================================================================