[comp.sys.mac.system] 7.0B1 question Finder memory size & Syquests

dlw@Atherton.COM (David Williams) (12/04/90)

A question about System 7.0B1 concerning memory allocated to the finder...

Using the current 6.x series system one may increase the amount of
memory allocated
to the finder via Get Info. This is nice as I've noticed that without a 
healthy amount of memory copying many files (ie +300) at a time or one
large file to a syquest cartridge will fail. The system gives a disk
write (cancel continue) error.

From what I've seen of 7.0B1 System the Finder's memory does not seem to
be changeable. If you do a get info on it you can't change its allocation as
it does not even show one. Is there a preferences somewhere else to allow one
to increase the amount of memory the Finder has available to it? Or
are the owners of some 600,000 syquest cartridges potentially out of luck in
terms of 7.0? It would be highly irrtating to have Finder copies continually
fail simply because it can not make use of memory that is physically or
virtually available when needed.

It looks as if the Finder permanently uses only 330k or so of memory...(this
figure is not precise as I am not currently staring at the About the Finder
box). As I remember some people also found that running with a larger finder
helped them out when running Virtual as well.

So whats the scoop? How does one give the Finder more memory under 7.0?

David Williams
dlw@atherton.com

pharr-matthew@cs.yale.edu (Matthew Pharr) (12/05/90)

In article <33819@athertn.Atherton.COM> dlw@Atherton.COM (David Williams) writes:
>A question about System 7.0B1 concerning memory allocated to the finder...
>
>Using the current 6.x series system one may increase the amount of
>memory allocated
>to the finder via Get Info. This is nice as I've noticed that without a 
>healthy amount of memory copying many files (ie +300) at a time or one
>large file to a syquest cartridge will fail. The system gives a disk
>write (cancel continue) error.
>
>From what I've seen of 7.0B1 System the Finder's memory does not seem to
>be changeable. If you do a get info on it you can't change its allocation as
>it does not even show one.
>So whats the scoop? How does one give the Finder more memory under 7.0?


If i remember correctly, 7.0 dynamically allocates memory to applications
as they need it, so thus the get info doesn't have anything of that sort
to change.

matt

jmunkki@hila.hut.fi (Juri Munkki) (12/05/90)

In <33819@athertn.Atherton.COM> dlw@Atherton.COM (David Williams) writes:
>From what I've seen of 7.0B1 System the Finder's memory does not seem to
>be changeable. If you do a get info on it you can't change its allocation as
>it does not even show one. Is there a preferences somewhere else to allow one
>to increase the amount of memory the Finder has available to it? Or
>are the owners of some 600,000 syquest cartridges potentially out of luck in
>terms of 7.0? It would be highly irrtating to have Finder copies continually
>fail simply because it can not make use of memory that is physically or
>virtually available when needed.

I don't have a copy of System 7.0, but I'm fairly sure that this good
old technique will work.

	1) Make a copy of the Finder and put it in a folder.
	2) Get Info on that file and change the allocated size.
	3) Move the active Finder from the system folder into another folder.
	4) Move the copy you modified into the system folder.
	5) Reboot.

   ____________________________________________________________________________
  / Juri Munkki	    /  Helsinki University of Technology   /  Wind  / Project /
 / jmunkki@hut.fi  /  Computing Center Macintosh Support  /  Surf  /  STORM  /
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

bob@nyssa.uucp (Bob Finch) (12/05/90)

In <33819@athertn.Atherton.COM> dlw@Atherton.COM (David Williams) writes:

>So whats the scoop? How does one give the Finder more memory under 7.0?

Changing the Finder's SIZE -1 resource with ResEdit works.
-- 
Bob Finch
bob%nyssa.uucp@unicorn.cc.wwu.edu
bob@nyssa.uucp

ldo@waikato.ac.nz (Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Waikato University) (12/06/90)

It seems to me that, if Apple took away the ability to easily change
the Finder's memory allocation, it's because they don't think there's
a good reason to do it any more.

In other words, if you find a situation where increasing the Finder's
memory size *does* help, it sounds like a bug, and should be reported
as such.

Disclaimer: what do I know? I'm still trying to get my copy of
System 7.0 beta...

Lawrence D'Oliveiro                       fone: +64-71-562-889
Computer Services Dept                     fax: +64-71-384-066
University of Waikato            electric mail: ldo@waikato.ac.nz
Hamilton, New Zealand    37^ 47' 26" S, 175^ 19' 7" E, GMT+13:00

kent@circus.camex.com (Kent Borg) (12/07/90)

In article <27586@cs.yale.edu> pharr-matthew@cs.yale.edu (Matthew Pharr) writes:
>If i remember correctly, 7.0 dynamically allocates memory to applications
>as they need it, so thus the get info doesn't have anything of that sort
>to change.

Nope.  The memory model under 7.0 is not very different from the
MultiFinder world of 6.0.x.  Applications need to say how much memory
they want at launch.  After that they cannot get more (mostly) or give
any up.

BUT, there is one difference: The old MultiFinder temporary memory is
closer to being real stuff now.  Applications can get hunks of memory
from MultiFinder (if they know how to ask for it) and keep those
chunks longer than the next WaitNextEvent (the old restriction).  This
memory should be used in ways where, if needed, the user can do
something to free up the temporary memory--like close a document or
window.

This means (I think) that new 7.0-only applications should be set to
get a partition that is only big enough for basic purposes, and when
the user does something extraordinary, get the extra from
MultiFinder--and be prepared to give that up.


P.S.  As someone else wrote, you can use ResEdit to edit Finder's
"SIZE" resource.  I did that recently and things work better now.  I
then opened literaly hundreds of windows, and though things got slow,
they kept working.  On reboot, however, only the first 40 were
re-opened--boooo.


--
Kent Borg                            internet: kent@camex.com   AOL: kent borg
                                            H:(617) 776-6899  W:(617) 426-3577
Kent's Invasion Countdown: 43 Days