aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) (10/25/90)
Hi guys, it's a lot of time that I read the new about the Next and the Mac, I think that look like silly begin a war between Macusers and Nextusers. The ones of you that think that Next is better, do that because they have good reasons, bye the other sidy the ones that think that Mac is better, have their reasons. IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. Like all in the world some things are good for some applications, and some others things are good for another type of applications. Is like to say PROST is better that SENNA or HONDA is better than FERRARI. The only thing of I am sure is that this sentences are only silly, and I am very surprised that so intelligent people full this space of news with silly news. Renzo Marcanzin aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it P.S. I have not a Mac or a NeXT.
cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) (10/25/90)
In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes: > IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. >P.S. I have not a Mac or a NeXT. No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know that NeXT IS better than a crapple mac. -- " ...and just who was Ken Thompson, anyway? Do you remember?"
domingo@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Alberto Domingo) (10/26/90)
In article <9519@helios.TAMU.EDU> cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) writes: >In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes: >> IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. > >No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know >that > NeXT IS better than a crapple mac. What is better? an apple or an orange? a formula 1 or a truck? clasic music or rock? a live concert or a CD record? onions or potatos? New York or Paris? pepsicola or cocacola? democrats or republicans? Bach or Bethoven? your taste or my taste? a Mac+ ($700 now, or less) or a NeXT ($3000, I'm not sure)? :-) Alberto.
scott@scotty (Scott Howard) (10/26/90)
What is finer than Flying?, said the Lord of the Eagles. Bilbo thought immediately of a warm home and breakfast, but looked down and thought the better of it.
fiddler@concertina.Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix) (10/26/90)
> In article <9519@helios.TAMU.EDU> cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) writes: > >In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes: > >> IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. > > > >No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know > >that > > NeXT IS better than a crapple mac. Indicating that ignorance greatly streamlines the decision-making process. -- ------------ The only drawback with morning is that it comes at such an inconvenient time of day. ------------
mussat@irisa.fr (Louis Mussat) (10/26/90)
From article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it>, by aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin): > > Is like to say PROST is better that SENNA or HONDA is better than > FERRARI. I was under the impression that you and me could agree on `` Prost PLUS Ferrari > any other team '' 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) > Renzo Marcanzin aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it / _ . / / (_) (_/ / | `-------------/-- / Louis Mussat mussat@irisa.fr
cafe@cbnewse.att.com (richard.dib) (10/27/90)
In article <9519@helios.TAMU.EDU>, cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) writes: > In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes: > > IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. > >P.S. I have not a Mac or a NeXT. > > No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know > that > NeXT IS better than a crapple mac. Oh yeah! Is that a new Mac? I heard about the IIsi,the LC and the classic, but never about the new clapple mac! ;) > > > -- > " ...and just who was Ken Thompson, anyway? Do you remember?" I do! The one I don't know is Chuck Herrick! :) Richard Dib