[comp.sys.mac.misc] ** Performance of Compression Utilities **

bdest@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Benoit Desjardins) (02/14/91)

This is a summary of the results of Ken Hancock's study of the 
compression utilities on the mac (Tidbits #42).  Results were ROUNDED 
OFF, to show more clearly the different categories of performance.  
Performance wise, Compactor is clearly the best one.
 
 
                                       +---------+---------+---------+
                                       |Binaries |Graphics |  Text   |
+-----------------+-------+------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+
| Software        |version| Cmp Method |%Cmp|time|%Cmp|time|%Cmp|time|
+-----------------+-------+------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+
| Compactor       | 1.2.1 |    n/a     | 42 | 18 | 55 | 28 | 53 |  3 |
| Stuffit Deluxe  |  2.0  | Best Guess | 42 | 36 | 55 | 39 | 53 | 13 |
| Stuffit Classic |  1.6  | Best Guess | 42 | 44 | 55 | 46 | 53 | 11 |
| Stuffit Deluxe  |  2.0  |   Better   | 42 | 60 | 55 | 63 | 53 | 16 |
| Stuffit Classic |  1.6  |   Better   | 42 | 68 | 55 | 69 | 53 | 15 |
| Disk Doubler    |  3.1  |  Method B  | 35 | 18 | 50 | 16 | 50 |  3 |
| Disk Doubler    |  3.1  |  Smallest  | 35 | 25 | 50 | 23 | 50 |  4 |
| Disk Doubler    |  3.1  |  Method A  | 25 |  8 | 50 |  7 | 50 |  2 |
| Stuffit Classic |  1.6  |    Fast    | 25 | 13 | 50 | 10 | 45 |  5 |
| Stuffit Deluxe  |  2.0  |    Fast    | 25 | 14 | 50 | 12 | 45 | 10 |
| Stuffit         | 1.5.1 |    Both    | 25 | 21 | 50 | 12 | 45 |  6 |
| Stuffit Deluxe  |  2.0  |   Optimal  | 25 | 33 | 50 | 34 | 45 | 13 |
| Stuffit Deluxe  |  2.0  |   Faster   | 14 |  6 | 33 |  6 | 27 | 10 |
+-----------------+-------+------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+
 
Binaries: 1.8 Megs of binary files in a directory
Graphics: 1.8 Megs of graphic files in a directory
Text:     222 K of text files in a directory
%Cmp:     % of compression achieved (more is better)
time:     time to compress (x 10 sec, on a SE/30) (less is better)