[comp.sys.mac.misc] Microtek vs LaCie color scanners

tn0o+@andrew.cmu.edu (Thomas Edgar Nichols) (02/26/91)

I've been assigned the task of choosing a color scanner for the computer
lab  where I work.  I have used a Microtek MSF-300Z scanner, and think
highly of it.  Until I saw ads for the LaCie Silverscanner, I thought
the Microtek was pretty much THE color-300-dpi-flat-bed scanner for
~$2000.  Unfortunatly the LaCie ad (running in MacUser and MacWorld)
totes no specs or hard numbers, just shows scans done on the Microtek &
Silver scan on "normal" settings.  Of course,  the MicroTek scan was
dark and brownish and the Silverscanner looks perfect.  I hate hype...

WHAT I would like to know, is any one out there using a LaCie
Silverscanner?  Have you used a MicroTek before?  Any comparisons?  Any
information would be greatly apprechiated.

Please respond by Email:  tn0o+@andrew.cmu.edu 

Thanks in advance
-Tom

mr2t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Tod Rose) (02/27/91)

Tom--

To tell the truth, the scanners are practically identical. LaCie
provides better software with their scanner (or used to -- I think
Microtek is shipping Photoshop now as well) and the price is better;
however, there is a new model of the Microtek that can be fitted with a
transparency attachment to scan 35mm slides and negatives.

Your best bet is to call both companies and ask for their literature on
the products, then compare features vs. price. Both produce quite
acceptable output, and my experience with Microtek service and support
is quite good.

-mike
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Michael T. Rose    mr2t@andrew.cmu.edu	        1069 Morewood Avenue
"One day you'll come home shining out loud/    Pittsburgh, PA  15213
 And we'll all be prouder than proud..." -Danny Wilson, *Davy*