[comp.sys.mac.misc] Mac vs Amiga vs IBM vs NEXT vs....

jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman) (03/06/91)

  Have you ever wondered why there are always flame wars in the comp.sys.mac
groups?  Is it because the users of the other machines "float" above these
newsgroups looking for a "kill?"
  I could come up with some _really_ stupid and childish reasons that would
add a good amount of fuel to the flame wars, but I just want my newsgroups to
be a nice place.  (That line sounds like a line in _Heathers!_, notice?)

  I think it is about high time that we DO form a new newsgroup where all
the mac lovers and amiga users and so on could flame away and tear each other
up into little tiny pieces.  It would be fun to read.  BUT I DON'T WANT TO
READ IT IN COMP.SYS.MAC.GAMES OR ANY OTHER MAC GROUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  Since this is a Mac group, I will not appeal to the "others."  Let's just
ignore them for the minute.  I think that every person who posts in these
groups should first think about what they are posting.  If the posting
has any other computer name used in it that warrants a comparison which
will result in a flame war, the writer should not post it, or should post
it in a neutral area, say Switzerland.  (Sorry, can't make this post seem
to stern!) 
  The latest mac vs amiga war was because of a phrase, not really even a
question like "Gee, there are so many games for the amiga and few for the
mac.."  This post was not needed.  It smelled of napalm.  Another post that
was obvivously flamable was the post titled "Why is the mac better than
messy-dos"  It's obvivous the poster wanted to start a fight.
  I am sure that all other computer users have their newsreaders set to scan
all our posting titles for the name of their computer, so that they can be
sure that everyone hears their side.  I'm not saying this is wrong, because
often times people say dumb things that are _totally_ false and need to be
corrected.  Hell, in my early NewsNet days, my motto was "type first, think
later."  BEFORE YOU POST, THINK ABOUT WHAT YOUR MESSAGE CAN TURN INTO.

#setenv HUMOUR ON

  On a side note, maybe us Mac users should for msome vigilante groups and
go into the amiga, next, and ibm groups and raise some cain, eh?  Just
kidding... :) :) :).  I'm a programmer, not a fighter, and besides, my
asbestos suit got lost at the cleaners. :)

#setenv HUMOUR OFF

|     John Taggart Gorman Jr.    | "I'm a no rust build up man myself."
|                                |          -Christian Slater
| jtgorman@caslon.cs.arizona.edu |             in 'Heathers'

geoff@pmafire.inel.gov (Geoff Allen) (03/09/91)

jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman) writes:

>  I think it is about high time that we DO form a new newsgroup where all
>the mac lovers and amiga users and so on could flame away and tear each other
>up into little tiny pieces.  It would be fun to read.  BUT I DON'T WANT TO
>READ IT IN COMP.SYS.MAC.GAMES OR ANY OTHER MAC GROUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That group exists.  It's called alt.religion.computers.

I know that all sites don't get alt, but that's a different story.

-- 
Geoff Allen          \  What's the difference between a garden slug and
uunet!pmafire!geoff   \   a two-inch long, living booger?
geoff@pmafire.inel.gov \                    -- Calvin

carl@udwarf.tymnet.com (Carl Baltrunas & Cherie Marinelli 1.0.4a) (03/10/91)

In article <1056@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>, jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman) writes:
> 
>   Have you ever wondered why there are always flame wars in the comp.sys.mac
> groups?  Is it because the users of the other machines "float" above these
> newsgroups looking for a "kill?"

I just posted this PS in another group as an aside to the general topic... we
all dislike having to WADE through tons and tons of flame war messages. Hey,...
why do we see them?  Because someone flames someone or asks a question and then
some other person responds to the message with a FOLLOWUP rather than a REPLY. 
Ok, so some news readers (the software not the humans) can't reply and can only
send a followup... is that true?  If not, then there is NO, (REPEAT NO)
excuse for not using the REPLY.. to reply privately with E-Mail to the person.

Like *MOST* of you, I subscribe to these groups to read about MAC software and
the experience of other MAC users.  If I want to read about the Amiga, the IBM,
the Next, the Adam, the CDC Cyber, etc... I'll subscribe to them. So, here is
the message of wisdom I added to my other post.  If we follow this rule, we'll
save the net and our fingers a lot of bandwidth...


PS. One of the best ways to avoid wasting bandwidth on "NOISE" is to tolerate
    the infractions of others and if you feel you MUST say something, say it in
    private E-Mail to the offending person.

    *NEVER* Flame anyone publically. Everyone makes mistakes from time to time.
    If you disagree with a person speak to that person and not the entire
    newsgroup (newsgroups if cross-posted) or mailing list.

If you ignore the flames... they die out, just like real fires.  A fire needs
3 things: Fuel, Air and Heat.   Hot air has 2 of these components already!

-Carl


Carl A Baltrunas - Catalyst Art
Cherie Marinelli - Bijoux
Internet: {carl or cherie}@udwarf.tymnet.com
          {carl or cherie}%udwarf@tardis.tymnet.com
UUCP:{sumex,apple}!oliveb!tymix!tardis!udwarf!{carl or cherie}