jdw4374@cec2.wustl.edu (The Mad Hatter) (03/19/91)
Hi! I have been trying to track down the creators of Kalidegraph, a scientific graphing package. I've plowed through past issues of MacWorld, but I haven't found anything about them. The lab that I have been managing has been using Cricket Graph (gag!) but I would like to try something better, and I've heard that Kalidegraph blows Cricket Graph out of the water. Has anyone used Kalidegraph, and if so, how did you like it? Have you also used Cricket Graph, and how does it compare to Cricket Graph? Thanx in advance! | Jeff Wolman | I am NOT Mad as a Hatter! | | (314)862-2900/889-5397 | My swinging from the rafters is not | | jdw4374@cec2.wustl.edu | actually happening; it just looks | | AOL: JeffW15 | like it. You're crazy, not me! | | Jeff Wolman | I am NOT Mad as a Hatter! | | (314)862-2900/889-5397 | My swinging from the rafters is not | | jdw4374@cec2.wustl.edu | actually happening; it just looks | | AOL: JeffW15 | like it. You're crazy, not me! |
bmh@demon.siemens.com (Beatrice M Hwong) (03/20/91)
In article <1991Mar18.200848.22933@cec1.wustl.edu> jdw4374@cec2.wustl.edu (The Mad Hatter) writes: > I have been trying to track down the creators of Kalidegraph, a > scientific graphing package. I've plowed through past issues of > MacWorld, but I haven't found anything about them. The lab that I ...deleted Try Synergy Software 2457 Perkiomen Ave Reading, PA 19606 phone: 215-779-0522, fax 215-370-0548, applelink D2296
ddaniel@lindy.stanford.edu (D. Daniel Sternbergh) (03/20/91)
In article <1991Mar18.200848.22933@cec1.wustl.edu> jdw4374@cec2.wustl.edu (The Mad Hatter) writes: > > I have been trying to track down the creators of Kalidegraph, a > scientific graphing package. I've plowed through past issues of > MacWorld, but I haven't found anything about them. The lab that I > have been managing has been using Cricket Graph (gag!) but I would > like to try something better, and I've heard that Kalidegraph > blows Cricket Graph out of the water. Has anyone used Kalidegraph, > and if so, how did you like it? Have you also used Cricket Graph, and > how does it compare to Cricket Graph? People develop chauvinisms about their graphing package, so you could find zealous supporters and vehement detractors of just about anything. Except CG, which everyone agrees sucks. I happen to be a KaleidaGraph fan. Best application for scientific work, with the possible exception of Igor, depending on what you're using it for. DeltaGraph is cute, but for MBA's, despite their literature. KaleidaGraph, however, has some pretty egregious annoyances -- I like it enough to care that they fix it right, so my research group has collected about four pages of bug fixes, annoying things and wishes for future releases, which we'll be sending to them. "They" are Synergy Software 2457 Perkiomen Avenue Reading PA 19606 (215) 779-0522 (215) 370-0548 (fax) AppleLink: D2296 == Daniel == 1.1 Scope: This specification covers cookie mixes for use by the Department of Defense as an item of general issue. 1.2 Classification: The cookie mixes shall be of the following types, as specified: Type I--Chocolate; Type II--Sugar; Type III--Oatmeal. (from MIL-C-43205F, Military Specifications for Cookie Mix, Dry)